Cited by 14Maternal and fetal healthcarePregnancy and preeclampsia studiesReproductive System and Pregnancy

The histologic evolution of revealed, acute abruptions

Open access
Chen, Athena L., Goldfarb, Ilona T., Scourtas, Aristana O., Roberts, Drucilla J.·2017·Human Pathology

Abstract

There is considerable interest in using pathology to confirm acute abruptions. It has been suggested that pathologic findings can help to determine the timing of abruptions. Because of the dearth of evidence in the literature supporting this claim and its medicolegal implications, we undertook this study to explore further the possibility of timing abruptions by histopathology. We sought to correlate bleeding interval (duration from maternal presentation with vaginal bleeding [revealed abruption] to placental delivery) with placental histopathologic findings. We performed a retrospective review of clinical data and placental pathology from all cases of clinically diagnosed, acute, revealed abruptions at a single, large institution in New England between 2000 and 2015. Cases were identified based on clinical diagnoses, bleeding intervals were calculated from clinical notes, and histologic evaluations were performed by 2 pathologists blinded to the bleeding intervals. A total of 177 cases were analyzed. Of these, 103 (58%) had histologic findings corroborating the clinical diagnosis of abruption. The most frequent finding was maternal surface indentation (51 cases) followed by intravillous hemorrhage (50 cases). The former was also the earliest finding, with a minimum bleeding interval of 4 minutes. In multivariate modeling, plasma cell deciduitis was significantly associated with a longer bleeding interval (median 63 hours). If there were 2 pathologic findings, there was a trend toward a longer bleeding interval. There was modest sensitivity for the pathologic diagnosis of acute revealed abruption. Although there was not a clear, stepwise progression of histologic lesions; the presence of 2 or more findings tended to be seen with longer bleeding intervals. Our results suggest that histologic findings cannot be used to time acute revealed abruptions reliably, and any interpretation of such should be made with caution.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.humpath.2017.08.007

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In the absence of parenchymal indentation and in chronic abruption, other nonspecific histologic features may be present on postpartum pathologic evaluation of the placenta, including intravillous and intervillous hemorrhage, early trophoblastic necrosis, and decidual inflammation.

    “In the absence of this indentation (e.g. if the abruption is acute and blood passes vaginally or into the amniotic fluid) and in chronic abruption, other nonspecific histologic features may be present on postpartum pathologic evaluation of the placenta, including intravillous and intervillous hemorrhage, early trophoblastic necrosis, and decidual inflammation (74).”

    From Placental abruption at near-term and term gestations: Pathophysiology, epidemiology, diagnosis, and management (2023) · cites this paper as [74]

    Split into 2 atoms — 1 confirmed, 1 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 31 · Cited by 14

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [19]Baergen RN Manual of Bernischke and Kaumann’s pathology of the human placenta 2 New York, NY Springer 2011

Authors
Chen, A. L., Goldfarb, I. T., Scourtas, A. O., & Roberts, D. J.
Affiliations
  • Massachusetts General Hospital (US)
  • Tufts University (US)
Corresponding author
Roberts, Drucilla J.
Venue
Human Pathology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2017-09
Volume
67
Pages
187-197
ISSN
0046-8177 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2749261836
Cited by
14
References
31
Citations by year
2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2018: 1
FWCI
0.60
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Human Pathology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (UL1TR001102)
  • National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Maternal and fetal healthcare
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Pregnancy and preeclampsia studies
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › Reproductive System and Pregnancy
Keywords
placental pathology, diagnostic sensitivity
MeSH terms
Abruptio Placentae, Acute Disease, Adolescent, Adult, Biopsy, Boston, Chorioamnionitis, Female, Hematoma, Humans, Middle Aged, Placenta, Predictive Value of Tests, Pregnancy, Pregnancy Outcome, Retrospective Studies, Risk Factors, Time Factors, Uterine Hemorrhage, Reproducibility of Results, Multivariate Analysis, Linear Models, Disease Progression, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review