The DOI matches its Crossref record; 35 of the 35 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Application of proximal surrogate indicators for safety evaluation: A review of recent developments and research needs
Open accessAbstract
Although there have been a number of recent reviews on the use of traffic conflict techniques (TCTs), none have focused on the use of proximal surrogate indicators. This paper comprehensively reviews the development and application of proximal surrogate safety indicators to address this gap. There is a particular focus on more recent advancements in the application of such indicators. For each of the main indicators reviewed, the paper provides a synthesis of the main guiding principles, as well as the most prominent features, including critical or threshold values used in the past. In addition, the main advantages and disadvantages of the reviewed indicators are highlighted. Finally, a number of research gaps are identified together with recommendations for potentially useful avenues of future research.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A Policy on Geometric Design of Highways and Streets 2001
Aashto (2001) · Cited by 1,998
Shea, A. (1992) · Journal of the Operational Research Society · doi:10.1057/jors.1992.108 · Cited by 996
Extended time-to-collision measures for road traffic safety assessment
Minderhoud, M. M., & Bovy, P. H. L. (2001) · Accident Analysis & Prevention · doi:10.1016/s0001-4575(00)00019-1 · Cited by 954
A comparison of headway and time to collision as safety indicators
Vogel, K. (2003) · Accident Analysis & Prevention · doi:10.1016/s0001-4575(02)00022-2 · Cited by 733
Surrogate Safety Measures from Traffic Simulation Models
Gettman, D., & Head, L. (2003) · Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board · doi:10.3141/1840-12 · Cited by 675
Derivation and Validation of New Simulation-Based Surrogate Safety Measure
Ozbay, K., Yang, H., Bartin, B., & Mudigonda, S. (2008) · Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board · doi:10.3141/2083-12 · Cited by 384
ANALYSIS OF TRAFFIC CONFLICTS AND COLLISIONS
Allen, B., Shin, B., & Cooper, P. (1978) · Transportation Research Record Journal of the Transportation Research Board · Cited by 335
1993 Intelligent Vehicles Symposium
(1993) · IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium · doi:10.1109/ivs.1993.697289 · Cited by 267
Safety performance functions using traffic conflicts
El-Basyouny, K., & Sayed, T. (2013) · Safety Science · doi:10.1016/j.ssci.2012.04.015 · Cited by 261
Huang, F., Liu, P., Yu, H., & Wang, W. (2013) · Accident Analysis & Prevention · doi:10.1016/j.aap.2012.08.018 · Cited by 240
Cited by
Gueriau, M., & Dusparic, I. (2020) · 2020 IEEE 23rd International Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITSC) · doi:10.1109/itsc45102.2020.9294174 · Cited by 133
Pauwels, A., Pourmohammad-Zia, N., & Schulte, F. (2022) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su142013486 · Cited by 8
Metadata
- Authors
- Mahmud, S. M. S., Ferreira, L., Hoque, M. S., & Tavassoli, A.
- Venue
- IATSS Research
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2017-12
- Volume
- 41
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 153-163
- ISSN
- 0386-1112 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2594367393
- Cited by
- 459
- References
- 35
- FWCI
- 27.39
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Application of proximal surrogate indicators for safety evaluation: A review of recent developments and research needs. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.iatssr.2017.02.001
- The paper
- Mahmud, S. M. S., Ferreira, L., Hoque, M. S., & Tavassoli, A. (2017). Application of proximal surrogate indicators for safety evaluation: A review of recent developments and research needs. IATSS Research. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iatssr.2017.02.001
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
