Anaerobic co-digestion of lipid-spent microalgae with waste activated sludge and glycerol in batch mode
Open accessIntegrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The text we found for this paper looks like another document, so the self-check wasn’t run.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 24 · Cited by 72
- Authors
- Neumann, P., Torres, A., Fermoso, F. G., Borja, R., & Jeison, D.
- Affiliations
- Universidad de La Frontera (CL)
- Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (ES)
- Corresponding author
- Jeison, D.
- Venue
- International Biodeterioration & Biodegradation
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2015-05
- Volume
- 100
- Pages
- 85-88
- ISSN
- 0964-8305 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2082042049
- Cited by
- 72
- References
- 24
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 1
- FWCI
- 14.97
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- hdl.handle.net
- Licence
- Locations
- International Biodeterioration & Biodegradation (publishedVersion)
- DIGITAL.CSIC (Spanish National Research Council (CSIC)) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Funders
- CONICYT-Chile (1120488)
- Marie Curie's International Research Staff Exchange Scheme (IRSES) (PIRSES-GA-2011-295165)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Building and Construction › Anaerobic Digestion and Biogas Production
- Physical Sciences › Energy › Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment › Algal biology and biofuel production
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Engineering › Microbial Fuel Cells and Bioremediation
- Keywords
- co-digestion, Botryococcus braunii, waste activated sludge, glycerol, biochemical methane potential, methane yield, first-order kinetic model, mesophilic digestion, wastewater treatment
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review