Cited by 50Natural Fiber Reinforced CompositesWood Treatment and Propertiesbiodegradable polymer synthesis and properties

Evaluation of wood-polyethylene composites biodegradability caused by filamentous fungi

Barton-Pudlik, Joanna, Czaja, Krystyna, Grzymek, Marek, Lipok, Jacek·2017·International Biodeterioration & Biodegradation

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ibiod.2017.01.014

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Barton-Pudlik, J., Czaja, K., Grzymek, M., & Lipok, J.
Affiliations
University of Opole (PL)
Corresponding author
Barton-Pudlik, Joanna
Venue
International Biodeterioration & Biodegradation
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2017-03
Volume
118
Pages
10-18
ISSN
0964-8305 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2579593298
Cited by
50
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 4
FWCI
2.66
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
International Biodeterioration & Biodegradation (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Polymers and Plastics › Natural Fiber Reinforced Composites
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Building and Construction › Wood Treatment and Properties
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Biomaterials › biodegradable polymer synthesis and properties
Keywords
biodegradability, filamentous fungi, mycelium, wood filler, softwood, deciduous wood, cellulose filler, water absorption, thermal decomposition, carbonization, fungal decay of wood

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review