Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 14Computability, Logic, AI AlgorithmsAdvanced Topology and Set Theorysemigroups and automata theory

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Learning families of algebraic structures from informant

Open access
Bazhenov, Nikolay, Fokina, Ekaterina, San Mauro, Luca·2020·Information and Computation

Abstract

We combine computable structure theory and algorithmic learning theory to study learning of families of algebraic structures. Our main result is a model-theoretic characterization of the class $\mathbf{InfEx}_{\cong}$, consisting of the structures whose isomorphism types can be learned in the limit. We show that a family of structures $\mathfrak{K}$ is $\mathbf{InfEx}_{\cong}$-learnable if and only if the structures from $\mathfrak{K}$ can be distinguished in terms of their $\Sigma^{\mathrm{inf}}_2$-theories. We apply this characterization to familiar cases and we show the following: there is an infinite learnable family of distributive lattices; no pair of Boolean algebras is learnable; no infinite family of linear orders is learnable.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ic.2020.104590

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Still being checked.

Research works printed but not linked: 20

  1. Gold, 1967, Language identification in the limit, Inf. Control, 10, 447, 10.1016/S0019-9958(67)91165-5 · DOI · Paper page
  2. Zeugmann, 2008, Learning recursive functions: a survey, Theor. Comput. Sci., 397, 4, 10.1016/j.tcs.2008.02.021 · DOI
  3. Lange, 2008, Learning indexed families of recursive languages from positive data: a survey, Theor. Comput. Sci., 397, 194, 10.1016/j.tcs.2008.02.030 · DOI
  4. Glymour, 1985, Inductive inference in the limit, Erkenntnis, 22, 23, 10.1007/BF00269958 · DOI
  5. Harizanov, 2007, On the learnability of vector spaces, J. Comput. Syst. Sci., 73, 109, 10.1016/j.jcss.2006.09.001 · DOI
  6. Merkle, 2004, Trees and learning, J. Comput. Syst. Sci., 68, 134, 10.1016/j.jcss.2003.08.001 · DOI
  7. Stephan, 2001, Learning algebraic structures from text, Theor. Comput. Sci., 268, 221, 10.1016/S0304-3975(00)00272-3 · DOI
  8. Fokina, 2019, Limit learning equivalence structures, vol. 98, 383
  9. Soare, 2016, 10.1007/978-3-642-31933-4 · DOI
  10. Ash, 2000, Computable Structures and the Hyperarithmetical Hierarchy, vol. 144
  11. Case, 1983, Comparison of identification criteria for machine inductive inference, Theor. Comput. Sci., 25, 193, 10.1016/0304-3975(83)90061-0 · DOI
  12. Jain, 2011, Hypothesis spaces for learning, Inf. Comput., 209, 513, 10.1016/j.ic.2010.11.016 · DOI
  13. Goncharov, 2002, Computable structure and non-structure theorems, Algebra Log., 41, 351, 10.1023/A:1021758312697 · DOI
  14. Friedberg, 1958, Three theorems on recursive enumeration. I. Decomposition. II. Maximal set. III. Enumeration without duplication, J. Symb. Log., 23, 309, 10.2307/2964290 · DOI
  15. Blum, 1975, Toward a mathematical theory of inductive inference, Inf. Control, 28, 125, 10.1016/S0019-9958(75)90261-2 · DOI · Paper page
  16. Knight, 2007, Turing computable embeddings, J. Symb. Log., 72, 901, 10.2178/jsl/1191333847 · DOI
  17. Calvert, 2004, Comparing classes of finite structures, Algebra Log., 43, 374, 10.1023/B:ALLO.0000048827.30718.2c · DOI
  18. Selivanov, 1988, Algorithmic complexity of algebraic systems, Math. Notes, 44, 944, 10.1007/BF01158034 · DOI
  19. Alaev, 2004, Computable homogeneous Boolean algebras and a metatheorem, Algebra Log., 43, 73, 10.1023/B:ALLO.0000020844.03135.a6 · DOI
  20. Montalbán, 2010, Counting the back-and-forth types, J. Log. Comput., 22, 857, 10.1093/logcom/exq048 · DOI

Cited by

See all 14

Metadata

Authors
Bazhenov, N., Fokina, E., & San Mauro, L.
Affiliations
  • Novosibirsk State University (RU)
  • TU Wien (AT)
Venue
Information and Computation
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-12
Volume
275
Pages
104590
ISSN
0890-5401 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2943260620
Cited by
14
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 4 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1
FWCI
0.75
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Information and Computation (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • CINECA IRIS Institutional Research Information System (University of Bari Aldo Moro) (submittedVersion)
  • Use Siena air (University of Siena) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
  • Russian Science Foundation
  • Austrian Science Fund
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computational Theory and Mathematics › Computability, Logic, AI Algorithms
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Geometry and Topology › Advanced Topology and Set Theory
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computational Theory and Mathematics › semigroups and automata theory
Keywords
computable structure theory, algorithmic learning theory, learning in the limit, isomorphism types, model-theoretic characterization, distributive lattices, Boolean algebra, linear orders, learnability

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Learning families of algebraic structures from informant. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.ic.2020.104590
The paper
Bazhenov, N., Fokina, E., & San Mauro, L. (2020). Learning families of algebraic structures from informant. Information and Computation. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ic.2020.104590

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.