Cited by 163Astro and Planetary ScienceFluid Dynamics and Turbulent FlowsHigh-pressure geophysics and materials

Effects of compressibility on driving zonal flow in gas giants

Open access
Gastine, T., Wicht, J.·2012·Icarus

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.icarus.2012.03.018

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In density-stratified convection, shallower and lighter fluid must overturn faster to respond to the momentum of fluid parcels coming from deeper thicker layers, leading to a gradual increase in mean velocity with increasing radius.

    “In density-stratified convection, shallower and lighter fluid must overturn faster to respond to the momentum of fluid parcels coming from deeper thicker layers. This leads to a gradual increase in the mean velocity with increasing radius”

    From Deep rotating convection generates the polar hexagon on Saturn (2020) · cites this paper as [31]

    Section 3.3.1 (p. 7) reports that convective flow amplitude increases with radius as background density falls, and §4.2 (p. 14) reports a shorter turnover timescale near the surface. These passages support faster shallower convection, but they do not describe it as a response to momentum from parcels in deeper layers or establish an increase in mean velocity specifically. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The Rossby number changes with depth; deeper layers with smaller Rossby number promote more coherent vortices and jets, while shallower layers with larger Rossby number favor more incoherent convection.

    “This leads to a situation where deeper layers with smaller Rossby number promote more coherent vortices and jets, while shallower layers with larger Rossby number favor more incoherent convection [31].”

    From Deep rotating convection generates the polar hexagon on Saturn (2020) · cites this paper as [31]

    Section 3.3.1 (p. 7) reports weaker, larger-scale convection at depth and stronger, smaller-scale convection outward. Section 4.2 (pp. 13–14) describes correlated, tilted flow in the interior but decorrelated, more radially oriented motion near the outer boundary; the Conclusion (p. 15) links that correlation to maintaining jets. The paper does not explicitly establish the claimed depth-dependent Rossby numbers or attribute the contrast in flow coherence to smaller versus larger Rossby numbers, and the reported outer-layer decorrelation is conditional on the simulation regime. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 57 · Cited by 163

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Williams, G.P., 1978. Planetary circulations. I - Barotropic representation of Jovian and terrestrial turbulence. Journal of Atmospheric Sciences 35, 13991426.

Authors
Gastine, T., & Wicht, J.
Affiliations
Max Planck Society (DE)
Corresponding author
Gastine, T.
Venue
Icarus
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2012-05
Volume
219
Issue
1
Pages
428-442
ISSN
0019-1035 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1993932223
Cited by
163
References
57
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 14 · 2013: 14 · 2012: 4
FWCI
7.35
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Icarus (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • Max Planck Institute for Plasma Physics (submittedVersion)
  • Max Planck Digital Library (submittedVersion)
  • MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Astro and Planetary Science
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Computational Mechanics › Fluid Dynamics and Turbulent Flows
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Geophysics › High-pressure geophysics and materials
Keywords
zonal flows, gas giants, compressible convection, anelastic approximation, density stratification, zonal jets, Reynolds stress, Rayleigh number, supercriticality, Boussinesq approximation, scaling laws

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review