3D modelling of the early martian climate under a denser CO2 atmosphere: Temperatures and CO2 ice clouds
Open accessIntegrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The warming effect of CO2 clouds on early Mars is likely to have been small in reality.
“Hence the warming effect of CO 2 clouds is likely to have been small in reality.”
From The Climate of Early Mars (2016) · cites this paper as Forget et al. 2013
Recent three-dimensional global climate modeling has shown that cloud coverage close to 100% is never reached in practice.
“Recent threedimensional global climate modeling (Forget et al. 2013; Wordsworth et al. 2013) has shown that this level is never reached in practice.”
From The Climate of Early Mars (2016) · cites this paper as Forget et al. 2013
The conclusion that a clear-sky CO2-H2O atmosphere alone could not have warmed early Mars has recently been confirmed by three-dimensional climate models that include cloud effects.
“This conclusion, which was reached by Kasting using a one-dimensional clear-sky radiativeconvective climate model, has recently been confirmed by three-dimensional climate models that include cloud effects (Forget et al. 2013; Wordsworth et al. 2013).”
From The Climate of Early Mars (2016) · cites this paper as Forget et al. 2013
Forget et al. (2013) and Soto et al. (2015) found that collapse of CO2 atmospheres due to surface condensation was extremely significant at low obliquities (below 20°) and at pressures above 3 bar.
“They found that the process was extremely significant at low obliquities (below 20 ◦ ) and at pressures above 3 bar.”
From The Climate of Early Mars (2016) · cites this paper as Forget et al. 2013
The predictions of Forget et al. (2013) and Soto et al. (2015) differed in detail, partly because Soto et al. (2015) neglected the effects of CO2 clouds and used the present-day solar luminosity.
“The predictions of Forget et al. (2013) and Soto et al. (2015) differed in detail, however, partly because Soto et al. (2015) neglected the effects of CO 2 clouds and used the present-day solar luminosity.”
From The Climate of Early Mars (2016) · cites this paper as Forget et al. 2013
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 130 · Cited by 341
- Authors
- Forget, F., Wordsworth, R., Millour, E., Madeleine, J.-B., Kerber, L., Leconte, J., Marcq, E., & Haberle, R. M.
- Affiliations
- École Normale Supérieure - PSL (FR)
- Institut Pierre-Simon Laplace (FR)
- Ames Research Center (US)
- Corresponding author
- Forget, F.
- Venue
- Icarus
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2013-01
- Volume
- 222
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 81-99
- ISSN
- 0019-1035 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2171310187
- Cited by
- 341
- References
- 130
- Citations by year
- 2026: 14 · 2025: 29 · 2024: 21 · 2023: 24 · 2022: 23 · 2021: 21 · 2020: 29 · 2019: 34 · 2018: 25 · 2017: 29 · 2016: 30 · 2015: 24 · 2014: 17 · 2013: 18 · 2012: 3
- FWCI
- 10.86
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Icarus (publishedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- Digital Access to Scholarship at Harvard (DASH) (Harvard University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- HAL (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Funders
- Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR-10-LABX-0047)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Planetary Science and Exploration
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Astro and Planetary Science
- Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Atmospheric Science › Geology and Paleoclimatology Research
- Keywords
- early Mars climate, CO2 atmosphere, greenhouse effect, CO2 ice clouds, faint young Sun, surface temperature, atmospheric pressure, obliquity, collision-induced absorption, cloud microphysics, planetary albedo, atmospheric dust, liquid water on Mars, valley networks
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review