The DOI matches its Crossref record; 61 of the 61 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The taxonomic distribution of asteroids from multi-filter all-sky photometric surveys
Open accessAbstract
Abstract The distribution of asteroids across the main belt has been studied for decades to understand the current compositional distribution and what that tells us about the formation and evolution of our Solar System. All-sky surveys now provide orders of magnitude more data than targeted surveys. We present a method to bias-correct the asteroid population observed in the Sloan Digital Sky Survey (SDSS) according to size, distance, and albedo. We taxonomically classify this dataset consistent with the Bus and Binzel (Bus, S.J., Binzel, R.P. [2002]. Icarus 158, 146–177) and Bus–DeMeo et al. (DeMeo, F.E., Binzel, R.P., Slivan, S.M., Bus, S.J. [2009]. Icarus 202(July), 160–180) systems and present the resulting taxonomic distribution. The dataset includes asteroids as small as 5 km, a factor of three in diameter smaller than in previous work such as by Mothe-Diniz et al. (Mothe-Diniz, T., Carvano, J.M.A., Lazzaro, D. [2003]. Icarus 162(March), 10–21). Because of the wide range of sizes in our sample, we present the distribution by number, surface area, volume, and mass whereas previous work was exclusively by number. While the distribution by number is a useful quantity and has been used for decades, these additional quantities provide new insights into the distribution of total material. We find evidence for D-types in the inner main belt where they are unexpected according to dynamical models of implantation of bodies from the outer Solar System into the inner Solar System during planetary migration (Levison, H.F., Bottke, W.F., Gounelle, M., Morbidelli, A., Nesvorný, D., Tsiganis, K. [2009]. Nature 460(July), 364–366). We find no evidence of S-types or other unexpected classes among Trojans and Hildas, albeit a bias favoring such a detection. Finally, we estimate for the first time the total amount of material of each class in the inner Solar System. The main belt’s most massive classes are C, B, P, V and S in decreasing order. Excluding the four most massive asteroids, (1) Ceres, (2) Pallas, (4) Vesta and (10) Hygiea that heavily skew the values, primitive material (C-, P-types) account for more than half main-belt and Trojan asteroids by mass, most of the remaining mass being in the S-types. All the other classes are minor contributors to the material between Mars and Jupiter.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Origin of the cataclysmic Late Heavy Bombardment period of the terrestrial planets
Gomes, R., Levison, H. F., Tsiganis, K., & Morbidelli, A. (2005) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature03676 · Cited by 1,737
Origin of the orbital architecture of the giant planets of the Solar System
Tsiganis, K., Gomes, R., Morbidelli, A., & Levison, H. F. (2005) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature03539 · Cited by 1,476
Collisional model of asteroids and their debris
Dohnanyi, J. S. (1969) · Journal of Geophysical Research · doi:10.1029/jb074i010p02531 · Cited by 1,214
Phase II of the Small Main-Belt Asteroid Spectroscopic Survey A Feature-Based Taxonomy
Bus, S. (2002) · Icarus · doi:10.1006/icar.2002.6856 · Cited by 982
An extension of the Bus asteroid taxonomy into the near-infrared
DeMeo, F. E., Binzel, R. P., Slivan, S. M., & Bus, S. J. (2009) · Icarus · doi:10.1016/j.icarus.2009.02.005 · Cited by 941
Self-citationChaotic capture of Jupiter's Trojan asteroids in the early Solar System
Morbidelli, A., Levison, H. F., Tsiganis, K., & Gomes, R. (2005) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature03540 · Cited by 939
Mainzer, A., Bauer, J., Grav, T., Masiero, J., Cutri, R. M., Dailey, J., Eisenhardt, P., McMillan, R. S., Wright, E., Walker, R., et al. (2011) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1088/0004-637x/731/1/53 · Cited by 883
Itokawa Dust Particles: A Direct Link Between S-Type Asteroids and Ordinary Chondrites
Nakamura, T., Noguchi, T., Tanaka, M., Zolensky, M. E., Kimura, M., Tsuchiyama, A., Nakato, A., Ogami, T., Ishida, H., Uesugi, M., et al. (2011) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1207758 · Cited by 612
Carry, B. (2012) · Planetary and Space Science · doi:10.1016/j.pss.2012.03.009 · Cited by 609
Self-citationThe fossilized size distribution of the main asteroid belt
BOTTKEJR, W., DURDA, D., NESVORNY, D., JEDICKE, R., MORBIDELLI, A., VOKROUHLICKY, D., & LEVISON, H. (2005) · Icarus · doi:10.1016/j.icarus.2004.10.026 · Cited by 589
Cited by
Solar System evolution from compositional mapping of the asteroid belt
DeMeo, F. E., & Carry, B. (2014) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature12908 · Cited by 527
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- DeMeo, F. E., & Carry, B.
- Venue
- Icarus
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2013-09
- Volume
- 226
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 723-741
- ISSN
- 0019-1035 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2059461957
- Cited by
- 422
- References
- 61
- FWCI
- 13.86
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The taxonomic distribution of asteroids from multi-filter all-sky photometric surveys. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.icarus.2013.06.027
- The paper
- DeMeo, F. E., & Carry, B. (2013). The taxonomic distribution of asteroids from multi-filter all-sky photometric surveys. Icarus. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.icarus.2013.06.027
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.