The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Preface, Executive Summary and Glossary
Abstract
These revised Recommendations for a System of Radiological Protection formally replace the Commission's previous, 1990, Recommendations; and update, consolidate, and develop the additional guidance on the control of exposure from radiation sources issued since 1990. Thus, the present Recommendations update the radiation and tissue weighting factors in the quantities equivalent and effective dose and update the radiation detriment, based on the latest available scientific information of the biology and physics of radiation exposure. They maintain the Commission's three fundamental principles of radiological protection, namely justification, optimisation, and the application of dose limits, clarifying how they apply to radiation sources delivering exposure and to individuals receiving exposure. The Recommendations evolve from the previous process-based protection approach using practices and interventions by moving to an approach based on the exposure situation. They recognise planned, emergency, and existing exposure situations, and apply the fundamental principles of justification and optimisation of protection to all of these situations. They maintain the Commission's current individual dose limits for effective dose and equivalent dose from all regulated sources in planned exposure situations. They reinforce the principle of optimisation of protection, which should be applicable in a similar way to all exposure situations, subject to the following restrictions on individual doses and risks; dose and risk constraints for planned exposure situations, and reference levels for emergency and existing exposure situations. The Recommendations also include an approach for developing a framework to demonstrate radiological protection of the environment.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Valentin, J. (2003) · PubMed · Cited by 184
Research works printed but not linked: 7
- ICRP, 1991, Ann. ICRP, 21
- ICRP, 1993, Ann. ICRP, 23
- ICRP, 1996, Ann. ICRP, 26
- ICRP, 2007, Ann. ICRP, 37
- ICRP, 1991, Ann. ICRP, 21
- ICRP, 2002, Ann. ICRP, 32
- 10.1016/j.icrp.2006.09.007 · doi:10.1016/j.icrp.2006.09.007
Cited by
Smith-Bindman, R., Miglioretti, D. L., Johnson, E., Lee, C., Feigelson, H. S., Flynn, M., Greenlee, R. T., Kruger, R. L., Hornbrook, M. C., Roblin, D., et al. (2012) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.2012.5960 · Cited by 898
Strategies for Reducing Radiation Dose in CT
McCollough, C. H., Primak, A. N., Braun, N., Kofler, J., Yu, L., & Christner, J. (2009) · Radiologic Clinics of North America · doi:10.1016/j.rcl.2008.10.006 · Cited by 842
Leuraud, K., Richardson, D. B., Cardis, E., Daniels, R. D., Gillies, M., O'Hagan, J. A., Hamra, G. B., Haylock, R., Laurier, D., Moissonnier, M., et al. (2015) · The Lancet Haematology · doi:10.1016/s2352-3026(15)00094-0 · Cited by 442
CBCT in orthodontics: assessment of treatment outcomes and indications for its use
Kapila, S. D., & Nervina, J. M. (2015) · Dentomaxillofacial Radiology · doi:10.1259/dmfr.20140282 · Cited by 423
Little, M. P., Azizova, T. V., Bazyka, D., Bouffler, S. D., Cardis, E., Chekin, S., Chumak, V. V., Cucinotta, F. A., de Vathaire, F., Hall, P., et al. (2012) · Environmental Health Perspectives · doi:10.1289/ehp.1204982 · Cited by 367
Metadata
- Venue
- Annals of the ICRP
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2007-04
- Volume
- 37
- Issue
- 2-4
- Pages
- 9-34
- ISSN
- 0146-6453 (ISSN-L)
- 1872-969X
- OpenAlex
- W2094153418
- Cited by
- 2,106
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 10.49
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- journals.sagepub.com/page/policies/text-and-data-mining-license (tdm)
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Preface, Executive Summary and Glossary. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.icrp.2007.10.003
- The paper
- Preface, Executive Summary and Glossary. (2007). Annals of the ICRP. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.icrp.2007.10.003
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.