Characterisation of lactic acid bacteria in spontaneously fermented camel milk and selection of strains for fermentation of camel milk.
Abstract
The microbial communities in spontaneously fermented camel milk from Ethiopia were characterised through metagenomic 16S rRNA sequencing and lactic acid bacteria were isolated with the goal of selecting strains suitable as starter cultures. The fermented camel milk microbiota was dominated either by Lactobacillales or by Enterobacteriaceae, depending on incubation temperature and the provider of the milk. Strains of species with a potential use as starter cultures i.e., Lactococcus lactis, Lactobacillus plantarum, and Pediococcus acidilactici, were isolated. Fast acidifiers of camel milk have been isolated from the species of Lc. lactis, P. acidilactici, and Streptococcus infantarius. Gram-negative and potentially pathogenic microorganisms were frequent in spontaneously fermented camel milk, indicating the need for improved hygiene in Ethiopian camel farms. The profiled microbiota of spontaneously fermented camel milk and the isolated LAB strains will significantly contribute towards improving food safety and food security in dry regions that depend on camel milk production.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
LAB strains able to acidify camel milk have been isolated and several have been genome sequenced.
“LAB strains able to acidify camel milk have been isolated (Abdelgadir et al., 2008; Drici, 2008; Drici et al., 2010; Gabed et al., 2015; Fugl et al., 2017) and several of these have been genome sequenced (Drici, 2008; Gabed et al., 2015; Bragason et al., 2020).”
From Modeled Structure of the Cell Envelope Proteinase of Lactococcus lactis (2020) · cites this paper as Fugl et al., 2017
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 41 · Cited by 44
- Authors
- Fugl, A., Berhe, T., Kiran, A., Hussain, S., Laursen, M. F., Bahl, M. I., Hailu, Y., Sørensen, K. I., Guya, M. E., Ipsen, R., & Hansen, E. B.
- Affiliations
- Technical University of Denmark (DK)
- Haramaya University (ET)
- Chr. Hansen (Denmark) (DK)
- University of Copenhagen (DK)
- Corresponding author
- Hansen, Egon Bech
- ORCID
- Venue
- International Dairy Journal
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2017-10
- Volume
- 73
- Pages
- 19-24
- ISSN
- 0958-6946 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2611480728
- Cited by
- 44
- References
- 41
- Citations by year
- 2026: 6 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 3
- FWCI
- 4.61
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- International Dairy Journal (publishedVersion)
- Research at the University of Copenhagen (University of Copenhagen) (submittedVersion)
- Technical University of Denmark, DTU Orbit (Technical University of Denmark, DTU) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Laurits Andersen's Fund
- Danish Development Fund, Danida (DFC 12-017DTU)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Animal Diversity and Health Studies
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Probiotics and Fermented Foods
- Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Infant Nutrition and Health
- Keywords
- camel milk, spontaneous fermentation, lactic acid bacteria, starter cultures, Lactococcus lactis, Lactobacillus plantarum, Pediococcus acidilactici, Streptococcus infantarius, Enterobacteriaceae, Lactobacillales, pathogenic bacteria, food safety, Ethiopia
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review