The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A primer on model selection using the Akaike Information Criterion
Open accessAbstract
A powerful investigative tool in biology is to consider not a single mathematical model but a collection of models designed to explore different working hypotheses and select the best model in that collection. In these lecture notes, the usual workflow of the use of mathematical models to investigate a biological problem is described and the use of a collection of model is motivated. Models depend on parameters that must be estimated using observations; and when a collection of models is considered, the best model has then to be identified based on available observations. Hence, model calibration and selection, which are intrinsically linked, are essential steps of the workflow. Here, some procedures for model calibration and a criterion, the Akaike Information Criterion, of model selection based on experimental data are described. Rough derivation, practical technique of computation and use of this criterion are detailed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A new look at the statistical model identification
Akaike, H. (1974) · IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control · doi:10.1109/tac.1974.1100705 · Cited by 51,879
Model selection and multimodel inference: a practical information-theoretic approach.
Guthery, F. S., Burnham, K. P., & Anderson, D. R. (2003) · The Journal of Wildlife Management · doi:10.2307/3802723 · Cited by 41,495
Bayesian Estimation of Dynamical Systems: An Application to fMRI
Friston, K. J. (2002) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1006/nimg.2001.1044 · Cited by 310
Parameter Identifiability of Fundamental Pharmacodynamic Models
Janzén, D. L. I., Bergenholm, L., Jirstrand, M., Parkinson, J., Yates, J., Evans, N. D., & Chappell, M. J. (2016) · Frontiers in Physiology · doi:10.3389/fphys.2016.00590 · Cited by 44
Cited by
A machine learning forecasting model for COVID-19 pandemic in India
Sujath, R., Chatterjee, J. M., & Hassanien, A. E. (2020) · Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment · doi:10.1007/s00477-020-01827-8 · Cited by 339
Experimental narratives: A comparison of human crowdsourced storytelling and AI storytelling
Beguš, N. (2024) · Humanities and Social Sciences Communications · doi:10.1057/s41599-024-03868-8 · Cited by 60
On the Variation of Structural Divergence Among Residues in Enzyme Evolution
Echave, J., & Carpentier, M. (2026) · Proteins: Structure, Function, and Bioinformatics · doi:10.1002/prot.70103 · Cited by 2
Metadata
- Authors
- Portet, S.
- Venue
- Infectious Disease Modelling
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2020
- Volume
- 5
- Pages
- 111-128
- ISSN
- 2468-0427 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3000355524
- Cited by
- 496
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 40.94
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A primer on model selection using the Akaike Information Criterion. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.idm.2019.12.010
- The paper
- Portet, S. (2020). A primer on model selection using the Akaike Information Criterion. Infectious Disease Modelling. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.idm.2019.12.010
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.