The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Robustness of Control Barrier Functions for Safety Critical Control**This work is partially supported by the National Science Foundation Grants 1239055, 1239037 and 1239085.
Open accessAbstract
Barrier functions (also called certificates) have been an important tool for the verification of hybrid systems, and have also played important roles in optimization and multi-objective control. The extension of a barrier function to a controlled system results in a control barrier function. This can be thought of as being analogous to how Sontag extended Lyapunov functions to control Lypaunov functions in order to enable controller synthesis for stabilization tasks. A control barrier function enables controller synthesis for safety requirements specified by forward invariance of a set using a Lyapunov-like condition. This paper develops several important extensions to the notion of a control barrier function. The first involves robustness under perturbations to the vector field defining the system. Input-to-State stability conditions are given that provide for forward invariance, when disturbances are present, of a “relaxation” of set rendered invariant without disturbances. A control barrier function can be combined with a control Lyapunov function in a quadratic program to achieve a control objective subject to safety guarantees. The second result of the paper gives conditions for the control law obtained by solving the quadratic program to be Lipschitz continuous and therefore to gives rise to well-defined solutions of the resulting closed-loop system.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Boyd, S., & Vandenberghe, L. (2004) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511804441 · Cited by 56,601
Cited by
Input-to-State Safety With Control Barrier Functions
Kolathaya, S., & Ames, A. D. (2019) · IEEE Control Systems Letters · doi:10.1109/lcsys.2018.2853698 · Cited by 328
Self-citationNonsmooth Barrier Functions With Applications to Multi-Robot Systems
Glotfelter, P., Cortes, J., & Egerstedt, M. (2017) · IEEE Control Systems Letters · doi:10.1109/lcsys.2017.2710943 · Cited by 312
Singletary, A., Klingebiel, K., Bourne, J., Browning, A., Tokumaru, P., & Ames, A. (2021) · 2021 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS) · doi:10.1109/iros51168.2021.9636670 · Cited by 182
Self-citationDisturbance Observer-based Robust Control Barrier Functions
Wang, Y., & Xu, X. (2023) · 2023 American Control Conference (ACC) · doi:10.23919/acc55779.2023.10156095 · Cited by 64
Self-citationA quantitative framework for layered multirate control: Toward a theory of control architecture
Matni, N., Ames, A. D., & Doyle, J. C. (2024) · IEEE Control Systems · doi:10.1109/mcs.2024.3382388 · Cited by 39
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Xu, X., Tabuada, P., Grizzle, J. W., & Ames, A. D.
- Venue
- IFAC-PapersOnLine
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2015
- Volume
- 48
- Issue
- 27
- Pages
- 54-61
- ISSN
- 2405-8963 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4292249799
- Cited by
- 586
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 15.31
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Robustness of Control Barrier Functions for Safety Critical Control**This work is partially supported by the National Science Foundation Grants 1239055, 1239037 and 1239085. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.ifacol.2015.11.152
- The paper
- Xu, X., Tabuada, P., Grizzle, J. W., & Ames, A. D. (2015). Robustness of Control Barrier Functions for Safety Critical Control**This work is partially supported by the National Science Foundation Grants 1239055, 1239037 and 1239085. IFAC-PapersOnLine. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ifacol.2015.11.152
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.