Cited by 20Drilling and Well EngineeringOffshore Engineering and TechnologiesOil and Gas Production Techniques

The DOI matches its Crossref record; the references it cites are not checked yet.

Design Principles Behind the Construction of an Autonomous Laboratory-Scale Drilling Rig

Open access
Loeken, Erik A., Trulsen, Alexander, Holsaeter, Andrew M., Wiktorski, Ekaterina, Sui, Dan, Ewald, Robert·2018·IFAC-PapersOnLine

Abstract

In recent years, hot topics such as digitalization, machine learning, digital twin and big data have evolved from being envisions on the paper to state of art solutions, expected to revolutionize drilling efficiency in the industry. Drilling automation tomorrow is all about exploiting the current state of technologies available to the entire operation of drilling a well. Not only can drilling automation limit costs and reduce the risk to rig personnel and the environment, but they also give access to locations of considerable potential that previously have been regarded unsafe or uneconomical to operate in. There are however some challenges in keeping up with the ever-increasing pace of the development. For one, testing of novel and innovative solutions is often very expensive because of non-productive rig time during implementation, trial runs and data evaluation. Also, the modern technologies require extensive R&D before on-site testing can even commence. While on land-rigs, some of these costs and risks can be greatly minimized, many offshore solutions lack that luxury. This paper presents an overview of the design principles that go into the construction of a fully autonomous laboratory-scale drilling rig at the University of Stavanger. It aims at describing 1) the engineering principles involved to resemble full-scale drilling operations on the laboratory scale, 2) design considerations and components, 3) component requirements for the rig, 4) control system algorithms f…

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ifacol.2018.06.356

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 5 · Cited by 20

Research works printed but not linked: 9

  1. Cayeux, E., Sui, D., Akisanmi, O., & Alani, O. (2017, April 5). Challenges in the Automation of a Laboratory-Scale Drilling Rig and Comparison with the Requirements for Full Scale Drilling Automation. Society of Petroleum Engineers. · DOI
  2. Cayeux, E., Skadsem, H.J., 2016. Modelling of the Dynamic Behavior of the Power Transmission of an Automatic Small Scale Drilling Rig. Paper OMAE2016-62523 presented at the OMAE conference in Trondheim, Norway, 25-30 June.
  3. Loeken, E., & Trulsen, A. (2017, May 29.). Bachelors Thesis: Construction, Design and Optimization of an Autonomous Laboratory-Scale Drilling Rig. University of Stavanger.
  4. Holsaeter, A. (2017, June 29.). Masters Thesis: Integration of modeling and drilling incident management of a realtime lab-scale autonomous drilling rig. University of Stavanger.
  5. Belayneh, M. A. (2017). Drill String Mechanics with Special Focus on Buckling, pages 5-56.
  6. Geekiyanage, S. Sui, D. & Aadnoy, B. (2018). Drilling Data Quality Management Case Study with Laboratory Scale Drilling Rig. Paper OMAE2018-77510, to be presented at the OMAE conference in 2018. · DOI
  7. Hamrick, Todd R. (2011). Optimization of Operating Parameters for Minimum Mechanical Specific Energy in Drilling. MSc Thesis, (West Virginia University, US) · DOI
  8. Akisanmi, O. A (2016, June 15.). Masters Thesis: Automatic Management of Rate of Penetration in Heterogeneous Formation Rocks. University of Stavanger.
  9. Meirovitch, L. (1967). Analytical methods in vibrations. New York: Macmillan, pp.47-51 and 63-65.

Metadata

Authors
Loeken, E. A., Trulsen, A., Holsaeter, A. M., Wiktorski, E., Sui, D., & Ewald, R.
Affiliations
  • University of Stavanger (NO)
  • International Research Institute of Stavanger (NO)
Corresponding author
  • Sui, Dan
  • Ewald, Robert
Venue
IFAC-PapersOnLine
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018
Volume
51
Issue
8
Pages
62-69
ISSN
2405-8963 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2884864660
Cited by
20
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 6
FWCI
2.20
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
IFAC-PapersOnLine (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Energy › Fuel Technology › Drilling and Well Engineering
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Ocean Engineering › Offshore Engineering and Technologies
  • Physical Sciences › Energy › Fuel Technology › Oil and Gas Production Techniques
Keywords
drilling automation, drilling parameter optimization, drill string dynamics, control algorithms, offshore drilling, digital twin, drilling cost reduction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review