Cited by 9Scheduling and Optimization AlgorithmsSimulation Techniques and ApplicationsHealthcare Operations and Scheduling Optimization

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Adaptive Simulation-Based Optimization for Production Scheduling: A Comparative Study

Open access
Quadras, Djonathan, Frazzon, Enzo M., Mendes, Lucio G., Pires, Matheus C., Rodriguez, Carlos M.T.·2022·IFAC-PapersOnLine

Abstract

Production planning and control is an essential activity for all production systems, as its performance directly affects important factors that are fundamental for business competitiveness. The flow shop scheduling problem is one of the most common problems involved in the planning of production systems, being often applied in the real world. The solution to this problem cannot be easily found due to its complexity, which makes it difficult to use methods that return optimal results due to their high computational execution time. Thus, Adaptive Simulation-Based Optimization is a tool with potential application as it considers the stochasticity of the problem, seeking solutions that are aligned with the real scenario through a simulation and optimizing the desired variables. The simulation-based optimization approach consists in a loop between an optimization heuristic/meta-heuristic and a simulation. The optimization inputs the simulation with a parameter set, while the simulation tests all the models generated by the optimization and returns the fitness function values. However, the literature presents several different heuristics, simulation approaches and optimization methodologies to solve the problem. The general objective of the present work is to comparatively evaluate different adaptive simulation-based optimization models for flow shop production systems. Two methods for comparison were considered, which apply a genetic algorithm integrated with a discrete events sim…

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ifacol.2022.09.430

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 31

  1. Abdel-Basset, 2018, A hybrid whale optimization algorithm based on local search strategy for the permutation flow shop scheduling problem, Future Generation Computer Systems, 85, 129, 10.1016/j.future.2018.03.020 · DOI
  2. Abdel-Basset, 2021, A simple and effective approach for tackling the permutation flow shop scheduling problem, Mathematics, 9, 1, 10.3390/math9030270 · DOI
  3. Agostino, Í.R.S., Broda, E., Frazzon, E.M., and Freitag, M. (2020). Using a Digital Twin for Production Planning and Control in Industry 4.0. In B. Sokolov, D. Ivanov, and A. Dolgui (eds.), Scheduling in Industry 4.0 and Cloud Manufacturing, volume 289 of International Series in Operations Research & Management Science, 39–60. Springer International Publishing, Cham. · DOI
  4. Al-Shayea, 2020, Model for Integrating Production Scheduling and Maintenance Planning of Flow Shop Production System, IEEE Access, 8, 208826, 10.1109/ACCESS.2020.3038719 · DOI
  5. Azab, 2019, A simulation-based optimization approach for external trucks appointment scheduling in container terminals, International Journal of Modelling and Simulation, 40, 321, 10.1080/02286203.2019.1615261 · DOI
  6. Azimi, 2021, A simulation optimization approach for the multi-objective multi-mode resource constraint project scheduling problem, International Journal of Industrial Engineering and Production Research, 32, 37
  7. Barbieri, 2021, A virtual commissioning based methodology to integrate digital twins into manufacturing systems, Production Engineering, 15, 397, 10.1007/s11740-021-01037-3 · DOI
  8. Chen, 2008, A hybrid genetic algorithm for the re-entrant fow-shop scheduling problem, Expert Systems with Applications, 34, 570, 10.1016/j.eswa.2006.09.021 · DOI
  9. Dai, 2013, Energy-efficient scheduling for a flexible flow shop using an improved genetic-simulated annealing algorithm, Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing, 29, 418, 10.1016/j.rcim.2013.04.001 · DOI
  10. Engin, 2011, An efficient genetic algorithm for hybrid flow shop scheduling with multiprocessor task problems, Applied Soft Computing, 11, 3056, 10.1016/j.asoc.2010.12.006 · DOI
  11. Ermolieva, 2005, Simulation-based optimization of social security systems under uncertainty, European Journal of Operational Research, 166, 782, 10.1016/j.ejor.2004.03.044 · DOI
  12. Espíndola, 2012, Integrating intelligent maintenance systems and spare parts supply chains, IFAC-PapersOnLine, 14, 1017
  13. Frazzon, 2017, Simulation-based analysis of a supplier-manufacturer relationship in lean supply chains, International Journal of Lean Six Sigma, 8, 262, 10.1108/IJLSS-03-2016-0009 · DOI
  14. Frazzon, 2018, Data-driven production control for complex and dynamic manufacturing systems, CIRP Annals, 67, 515, 10.1016/j.cirp.2018.04.033 · DOI
  15. Frazzon, 2016, Simulation-based optimization for the integrated scheduling of production and logistic systems, IFAC-PapersOnLine, 49, 1050, 10.1016/j.ifacol.2016.07.581 · DOI
  16. Gupta, 1968, A general algorithm for the n×M flowshop scheduling problem, International Journal of Production Research, 7, 241, 10.1080/00207546808929814 · DOI
  17. Holland, 1973, Genetic Algorithms and The Optimal Allocation of Trials, Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics, 2, 88
  18. Irawan, 2021, Simulation-based optimisation for stochastic maintenance routing in an ofshore wind farm, European Journal of Operational Research, 289, 912, 10.1016/j.ejor.2019.08.032 · DOI
  19. Keskin, 2021, A hybrid genetic local and global search algorithm for solving no-wait flow shop problem with bi criteria, SN Applied Sciences, 3, 10.1007/s42452-021-04615-3 · DOI
  20. Lebbar, 2018, Multi-criteria blocking flow shop scheduling problems: Formulation and performance analysis, Advances in Production Engineering And Management, 13, 136, 10.14743/apem2018.2.279 · DOI
  21. Li, 2021, Enhancing whale optimization algorithm with chaotic theory for permutation flow shop scheduling problem, International Journal of Computational Intelligence Systems, 14, 651, 10.2991/ijcis.d.210112.002 · DOI
  22. Palmer, 1965, Sequencing Jobs Through a MultiStage Process in the Minimum Total Time - A Quick Method of Obtaining a Near Optimum, Operational Research Quarterly, 16, 101, 10.1057/jors.1965.8 · DOI
  23. Paprocka, 2021, The method of production scheduling with uncertainties using the ants colony optimisation, Applied Sciences, 11, 1
  24. Pereira, 2018, Forecasting scrap tires returns in closed-loop supply chains in brazil, Journal of Cleaner Production, 188, 741, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.04.026 · DOI
  25. Pires, 2020, Simulation-based optimization for the integrated control of production and logistics: A performance comparison, IFAC-PapersOnLine, 53, 10639, 10.1016/j.ifacol.2020.12.2824 · DOI
  26. Reiter, 2011, An approach for the sustainable integration of production and transportation scheduling, International Journal of Logistics Systems and Management, 10, 158, 10.1504/IJLSM.2011.042626 · DOI
  27. Saraçoğlu, 2021, Minimizing makespan and fowtime in a parallel multi-stage cellular manufacturing company, Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing, 72, 1
  28. Shakibayifar, 2019, An intelligent simulation platform for train traffic control under disturbance, International Journal of Modelling and Simulation, 39, 135, 10.1080/02286203.2018.1488110 · DOI
  29. Takeda Berger, 2019, Towards a data-driven predictive-reactive production scheduling approach based on inventory availability, IFAC-PapersOnLine, 52, 1343, 10.1016/j.ifacol.2019.11.385 · DOI
  30. Turan, 2020, A risk-averse simulation-based approach for a joint optimization of workforce capacity, spare part stocks and scheduling priorities in maintenance planning, Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 204, 10.1016/j.ress.2020.107199 · DOI
  31. Vieira, 2017, Evaluating the Robustness of Production Schedules using Discrete-Event Simulation, IFAC-PapersOnLine, 50, 7953, 10.1016/j.ifacol.2017.08.896 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

  • Performance analysis of production scheduling in Toyota simulation

    Mangngenre, S., Indah, A. B., Syamsul, D., Arief, A., & Novawanda, O. (2025) · Acta Logistica · doi:10.22306/al.v12i1.592 · Cited by 1

    “…has become an invaluable asset for analyzing and optimizing production systems, allowing companies to assess different scheduling scenarios, pinpoint bottlenecks, and experiment with alternative scheduling strategies in a virtual environment before implementation in real production settings [5-7].”

Metadata

Authors
Quadras, D., Frazzon, E. M., Mendes, L. G., Pires, M. C., & Rodriguez, C. M. T.
Affiliations
Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (BR)
Corresponding author
  • Quadras, Djonathan
  • Frazzon, Enzo M.
Venue
IFAC-PapersOnLine
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2022
Volume
55
Issue
10
Pages
424-429
ISSN
2405-8963 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4312228380
Cited by
9
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1
FWCI
0.57
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
IFAC-PapersOnLine (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (FR 3658/1-1)
  • Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (99999.006033/2015-06)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering › Scheduling and Optimization Algorithms
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Simulation Techniques and Applications
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Healthcare Operations and Scheduling Optimization
Keywords
flow shop scheduling, production scheduling, genetic algorithm, discrete event simulation, dispatching rules, makespan, production planning and control, metaheuristic optimization

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review