Cited by 301Plasma Applications and DiagnosticsPesticide Residue Analysis and SafetyPostharvest Quality and Shelf Life Management

Atmospheric cold plasma dissipation efficiency of agrochemicals on blueberries

Open access
Sarangapani, Chaitanya, O'Toole, Grainne, Cullen, P.J., Bourke, Paula·2017·Innovative Food Science & Emerging Technologies

Abstract

Cold plasma has emerged as a potential bio-decontamination technology for microbial and chemical risks associated with food products such as fruits and vegetables. This study investigated the efficacy of cold plasma treatment for the degradation of pesticides (boscalid and Imidacloprid) on blueberries in tandem with the need to retain critical quality attributes of a fresh high value berry product post treatment. An in-package high voltage dielectric barrier discharge plasma reactor was employed for this study. The degradation efficacy of pesticides after 80kV and 5min of cold plasma treatment were found to be 80.18% for boscalid and 75.62% for Imidacloprid. Total phenol and flavonoid contents of blueberries increased significantly for 1min treated samples for all applied voltages. However, plasma treatment significantly decreased the ascorbic acid at longer plasma doses. There was no significant effect on physical parameters such as color while acceptable changes were observed in blueberry firmness. This study demonstrates effective chemical decontamination of blueberries whilst maintaining critical nutritional and physical quality parameters, offering an alternative process for quality retention of processing sensitive high value berry products.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ifset.2017.02.012

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 54 · Cited by 301

Authors
Sarangapani, C., O'Toole, G., Cullen, P. J., & Bourke, P.
Affiliations
  • Dublin Institute of Technology (IE)
  • UNSW Sydney (AU)
Corresponding author
Bourke, Paula
Venue
Innovative Food Science & Emerging Technologies
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2017-12
Volume
44
Pages
235-241
ISSN
1466-8564 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2589482267
Cited by
301
References
54
Citations by year
2026: 28 · 2025: 37 · 2024: 32 · 2023: 45 · 2022: 48 · 2021: 36 · 2020: 38 · 2019: 25 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 3
FWCI
15.78
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Innovative Food Science & Emerging Technologies (acceptedVersion)
  • Arrow - TU Dublin (Technological University Dublin) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • Arrow@dit (Dublin Institute of Technology) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Department of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food, Ireland (13/F/444)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Plasma Applications and Diagnostics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Pesticide Residue Analysis and Safety
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Postharvest Quality and Shelf Life Management
Keywords
non-thermal plasma, dielectric barrier discharge, pesticide degradation, boscalid, imidacloprid, blueberry, vitamin C retention, phenolic content, flavonoids, fruit quality preservation, food decontamination

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review