Inactivation effects, kinetics and mechanisms of air-and nitrogen-based cold atmospheric plasma on Pseudomonas aeruginosa
Abstract
Cold atmospheric plasma (CAP) technology has attracted great interest in food processing as a novel microbe inactivation strategy. This study investigated the effects of CAP's inactivation on Pseudomonas aeruginosa and its kinetics under air- and nitrogen-CAP. Effects of reactive species on cell membranes were also studied to reveal the inactivation mechanism of air and nitrogen-based CAP. The results demonstrated that air-CAP had better inactivation capacity than that of nitrogen-CAP and Modified logistic and Dose-response models were suitable for depicting the inactivation actions of P. aeruginosa. Multiple factors contributed to the inactivation effect, such as damage to the cell morphology, changes in membrane permeability, destruction of intracellular ionic equilibrium and lipid peroxidation. Interestingly, damages of air and nitrogen-CAP to cell membrane may be different, indicating that plasma generated by different gases had different targets when attacking cells. Air-CAP could pose more severe destruction to cell membranes compared to nitrogen-CAP, while nitrogen-CAP would cause fragmentations of biomacromolecules. These findings provided some insights for further investigation of bacteria inactivation mechanisms.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
CP with oxygen as the working gas effectively reduced the psychrophilic bacteria count in freeze-dried bovine colostrum.
“CP with oxygen as the working gas, effectively reduced its psychrophilic bacteria count in freeze-dried bovine colostrum [50].”
From Effect of Atmospheric Cold Plasma Treatment on the Microorganism Growth, Diversity, and Quality of Coconut Water During Refrigerator Storage (2025) · cites this paper as [50]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Zeng, L., Gu, W., Wang, Y., Deng, W., Wang, J., & Zhang, L. (2025) · Foods · doi:10.3390/foods14152709 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
- Authors
- Zhao, Y., Shao, L., Jia, L., Zou, B., Dai, R., Li, X., & Jia, F.
- Affiliations
- China Agricultural University (CN)
- University of Arkansas at Fayetteville (US)
- Corresponding author
- Li, Xingmin
- Jia, Fei
- Venue
- Innovative Food Science & Emerging Technologies
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2022-07
- Volume
- 79
- Pages
- 103051
- ISSN
- 1466-8564 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4282829345
- Cited by
- 38
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 2
- FWCI
- 4.71
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- Locations
- Innovative Food Science & Emerging Technologies (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Plasma Applications and Diagnostics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Biotechnology › Microbial Inactivation Methods
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Biotechnology › Listeria monocytogenes in Food Safety
- Keywords
- cold atmospheric plasma, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, bacterial inactivation, inactivation kinetics, reactive species, cell membrane damage, membrane permeability, lipid peroxidation, modified logistic model, dose-response modeling, food processing, antimicrobial inactivation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review