University students' online academic help seeking: The role of self-regulation and information commitments
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Much of the literature on help-seeking in higher education has focused on traditional face-to-face learning settings without paying enough attention to online learners.
“Much of the literature on help-seeking in higher education has focused on traditional face-to-face learning settings without paying enough attention to those online learners (Cheng et al., 2013).”
From A Systematic Review of Studies Exploring Help-Seeking Strategies in Online Learning Environments (2023) · cites this paper as Cheng et al., 2013
Learning is not self-regulated despite its importance in achievement for university students.
“(2) learning is not self-regulated despite its importance in achievement for university students (Cheng et al., 2013; Yot-Domínguez and Carlos, 2017).”
From Using version control to document genuine effort in written assignments: a protocol with examples for universities (2023) · cites this paper as Cheng et al., 2013
Cites
Becoming a Self-Regulated Learner: An Overview
Zimmerman, B. J. (2002) · Theory Into Practice · doi:10.1207/s15430421tip4102_2 · Cited by 7,305 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Self-regulated learning (SRL) refers to an active and constructive process inwhich an individual is cognitively, motivationally, and behaviorally engaged in his/ her own learning (Zimmerman, 2001, 2002).”
BackgroundA Conceptual Framework for Assessing Motivation and Self-Regulated Learning in College Students
Pintrich, P. R. (2004) · Educational Psychology Review · doi:10.1007/s10648-004-0006-x · Cited by 3,269 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
An Online Engagement Framework for Higher Education
(2018) · doi:10.24059/olj.v22i1.1175 · Cited by 497 · see citing works
Help-Seeking in an Academic Context: A Systematic Review
Martín-Arbós, S., Castarlenas, E., & Dueñas, J.-M. (2021) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su13084460 · Cited by 84 · see citing works
A Systematic Review of Studies Exploring Help-Seeking Strategies in Online Learning Environments
Yang, F., & Stefaniak, J. (2023) · Online Learning · doi:10.24059/olj.v27i1.3400 · Cited by 27 · see citing works
Jiang, X., & Yu, Z. (2025) · Interactive Learning Environments · doi:10.1080/10494820.2025.2457352 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
Orbán, L. L. (2023) · Frontiers in Education · doi:10.3389/feduc.2023.1169938 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
- Authors
- Cheng, K.-H., Liang, J.-C., & Tsai, C.-C.
- Affiliations
- National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University (TW)
- National Taiwan University of Science and Technology (TW)
- Corresponding author
- Cheng, Kun-Hung
- Venue
- The Internet and Higher Education
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2013-01
- Volume
- 16
- Pages
- 70-77
- ISSN
- 1096-7516 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2055812088
- Cited by
- 119
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 8 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 6
- FWCI
- 29.54
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- The Internet and Higher Education (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Science Council
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Education › Online and Blended Learning
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Educational Strategies and Epistemologies
- Keywords
- student self-regulation, university students, informal help-seeking, mediation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review