Cited by 119Online and Blended LearningInnovative Teaching and Learning MethodsEducational Strategies and Epistemologies

University students' online academic help seeking: The role of self-regulation and information commitments

Cheng, Kun-Hung, Liang, Jyh-Chong, Tsai, Chin-Chung·2013·The Internet and Higher Education

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.iheduc.2012.02.002

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Authors
Cheng, K.-H., Liang, J.-C., & Tsai, C.-C.
Affiliations
  • National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University (TW)
  • National Taiwan University of Science and Technology (TW)
Corresponding author
Cheng, Kun-Hung
Venue
The Internet and Higher Education
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2013-01
Volume
16
Pages
70-77
ISSN
1096-7516 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2055812088
Cited by
119
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 6
FWCI
29.54
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
The Internet and Higher Education (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Science Council
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Online and Blended Learning
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Educational Strategies and Epistemologies
Keywords
student self-regulation, university students, informal help-seeking, mediation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review