Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 302

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Rethinking the accessibility of online higher education: A historical review

Open access
Lee, Kyungmee·2017·The Internet and Higher Education
DOI 10.1016/j.iheduc.2017.01.001
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.iheduc.2017.01.001

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Research works printed but not linked: 49

  1. Adams, 2007, Then and now: Lessons from history concerning the merits and problems of distance education, Studies in Media & Information Literacy Education, 7, 1, 10.3138/sim.7.1.002 · DOI
  2. Athabasca University, 2015, Mission & Mandate.
  3. Baggaley, 2008, Where did distance education go wrong?, Distance Education, 29, 39, 10.1080/01587910802004837 · DOI
  4. Baggaley, 2013, MOOC rampant, Distance Education, 34, 368, 10.1080/01587919.2013.835768 · DOI
  5. Bayne, 2015, What's the matter with “technology-enhanced learning”?, Learning, Media and Technology, 40, 5, 10.1080/17439884.2014.915851 · DOI · Paper page
  6. Bayne, 2015, Open education: The need for a critical approach, Learning, Media and Technology, 40, 247, 10.1080/17439884.2015.1065272 · DOI
  7. Battalio, 2007, Interaction online: A reevaluation, The Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 8, 339
  8. Bergmann, 2001, The silent university: The society to encourage studies at home, 1873–1897, New England Quarterly, 74, 447, 10.2307/3185427 · DOI
  9. Brabazon, 2007, Mobile learning: The iPodification of universities, Nebula, 4, 119
  10. Choi, 2013, The extent of and reasons for not re-enrollment: A case of Korean National Open Universtiy, The International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning., 14, 10.19173/irrodl.v14i4.1314 · DOI
  11. Davies, 2010, A review of trends in distance education scholarship at research universities in North America, 1998–2008, International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 11, 10.19173/irrodl.v11i3.876 · DOI
  12. Edwards, 1995, Different discourses, discourse of difference: Globalisation, distance education and open learning, Distance Education, 4, 27
  13. Feenberg, 1992, Subversive rationalization: Technology, power, and democracy, Inquiry, 35, 301, 10.1080/00201749208602296 · DOI
  14. Foucault, 1985, The history of sexuality, vol. 2: The use of pleasure
  15. Guglielmo, 1998, Computer conferencing systems as seen by a designer of online courses, Educational Technology, 38, 36
  16. Guri-Rosenblit, 2009, Distance education in the digital age: Common misconceptions and challenging tasks, Journal of Distance Education, 23, 105
  17. Hamilton, 2013, Online education: A science and technology studies perspective, Canadian Journal of Learning and Technology, 39, 10.21432/T2001C · DOI
  18. Harasim, 2000, Shift happens: Online education as a new paradigm in learning, Internet and Higher Education, 3, 41, 10.1016/S1096-7516(00)00032-4 · DOI · Paper page
  19. Harting, 2005, History of distance learning, Information Technology, Learning and Performance Journal, 23, 35
  20. Jonassen, 1991, Objectivism versus constructivism: Do we need a new philosophical paradigm?, Educational Technology Research and Development, 39, 5, 10.1007/BF02296434 · DOI · Paper page
  21. Keegan, 1980, On defining distance education, Distance Education, 1, 13, 10.1080/0158791800010102 · DOI · Paper page
  22. Keegan, 1988, Problems in defining the field of distance education, The American Journal of Distance Education, 2, 4, 10.1080/08923648809526619 · DOI
  23. Knox, 2013, Five critiques of the open educational resources movement, Teaching in Higher Education, 18, 821, 10.1080/13562517.2013.774354 · DOI
  24. Larreamendy-Joerns, 2006, Going the distance with online education, Review of Educational Research, 76, 567, 10.3102/00346543076004567 · DOI
  25. Laurillard, 2016, The educational problem that MOOCs could solve: Professional development for teachers of disadvantaged students, Research in Learning Technology, 24
  26. Lefranc, 1984, The openness of open learning, Educational Media International, 21, 3, 10.1080/09523988408548774 · DOI
  27. Lewis, 2002, The hybridisation of conventional higher education: UK perspective, The International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 2, 10.19173/irrodl.v2i2.58 · DOI
  28. Levy, 2007, Comparing dropouts and persistence in e-learning courses, Computers & Education, 48, 185, 10.1016/j.compedu.2004.12.004 · DOI · Paper page
  29. McAndrew, 2010, Defining openness: Updating the concept of “open” for a connected world, Journal of Interactive Media in Education, 10, 1
  30. McKeown, 2007, Factors associated with Internet use: Does rurality matter?, Rural and Small Town Canada Analysis Bulletin, 7, 1
  31. Moore, 1973, Towards a theory of independent learning and teaching, Journal of Higher Education, 44, 661, 10.2307/1980599 · DOI
  32. Naidu, 2005, Researching distance education and e-learning, Vol. 4, 1564
  33. Njenga, 2010, The myths about e-learning in higher education, British Journal of Educational Technology, 41, 199, 10.1111/j.1467-8535.2008.00910.x · DOI · Paper page
  34. Paechter, 2010, Students' expectations of, and experiences in e-learning: Their relation to learning achievements and course satisfaction, Computers & Education, 54, 222, 10.1016/j.compedu.2009.08.005 · DOI · Paper page
  35. Rachal, 2002, Andragogy's detectives: A critique of the present and a proposal for the future, Adult Education Quarterly, 52, 210, 10.1177/0741713602052003004 · DOI
  36. Rabiee, 2013, An explanation for Internet use obstacles concerning e-learning in Iran, International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 14, 361, 10.19173/irrodl.v14i3.1412 · DOI
  37. Sandlin, 2005, Andragogy and its discontents: An analysis of andragogy from three critical perspectives, PAACE Journal of Lifelong Learning, 14, 25
  38. Selwyn, 2009, Challenging educational expectations of the social web: A web 2.0 far?, Nordic Journal of Digital Literacy, 4, 72, 10.18261/ISSN1891-943X-2009-02-02 · DOI
  39. Selwyn, 2011, ‘Finding an appropriate fit for me’: Examining the (in)flexibilities of international distance learning, International Journal of Lifelong Education, 20, 367, 10.1080/02601370.2011.570873 · DOI
  40. Simonson, 2012, MOOC madness, Distance Learning, 9, 103
  41. Sims, 2008, Rethinking (e)learning: A manifesto for connected generations, Distance Education, 29, 153, 10.1080/01587910802154954 · DOI
  42. Sumner, 2010, Serving the system: A critical history of distance education, Open Learning: The Journal of Open, Distance and e-learning, 15, 267, 10.1080/713688409 · DOI
  43. Tracey, 2005, The evolution of distance education, Distance Learning, 2, 17
  44. Vrasidas, 2000, Constructivism versus objectivism: Implications for interaction, course design, and evaluation in distance education, International Journal of Educational Telecommunications, 6, 339
  45. Wedemeyer, 1971, Independent study, Vol. 4, 548
  46. White, 2012, Learning online? Educational Internet use and participation in adult learning, 2002 to 1010, Educational Review, 64, 451, 10.1080/00131911.2011.626123 · DOI
  47. Xin, 2006, Pedagogy in cyberspace: The dynamics of online discourse, Journal of Distance Education, 21, 1
  48. Zawacki-Richter, 2009, Review of distance education research (2000 to 2008): Analysis of research areas, methods, and authorship patterns, International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 10, 10.19173/irrodl.v10i6.741 · DOI · Paper page
  49. Zhu, 2009, Cultural differences in the perception of a social-constructivist e-learning environment, British Journal of Educational Technology, 40, 164, 10.1111/j.1467-8535.2008.00879.x · DOI

Cited by

See all 302

Metadata

Authors
Lee, K.
Venue
The Internet and Higher Education
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2017-04
Volume
33
Pages
15-23
ISSN
1096-7516 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1016/j.iheduc.2017.01.001
OpenAlex
W2572684958
Cited by
302
References
2
FWCI
66.64
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green
Licence
www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Rethinking the accessibility of online higher education: A historical review. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.iheduc.2017.01.001
The paper
Lee, K. (2017). Rethinking the accessibility of online higher education: A historical review. The Internet and Higher Education. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2017.01.001

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.