Probiotics for the prevention of respiratory tract infections: a systematic review
Abstract
We evaluated the clinical evidence regarding probiotic use for the prevention of respiratory tract infections (RTIs). Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) studying the effects of probiotics for the prevention of upper or lower RTIs were systematically identified. Fourteen RCTs (twelve involving healthy subjects and two involving patients with RTIs) were included. Various Lactobacillus strains were used in seven RCTs, combinations of Lactobacillus and Bifidobacterium strains were used in five RCTs, and a Bifidobacterium strain and a non-pathogenic Enterococcus faecalis strain were used in one RCT, respectively. In ten RCTs no difference was found regarding the incidence of RTIs in the probiotic arm compared with the control arm, whereas the remaining four RCTs favoured the use of probiotics. Reduction in the severity of symptoms related to RTIs was noted in five of six RCTs that provided relevant data. In three of nine RCTs that provided relevant data, the clinical course of RTIs was shorter in the probiotic arm, whereas no difference was found in the remaining six RCTs. In conclusion, probiotics may have a beneficial effect on the severity and duration of symptoms of RTIs but do not appear to reduce the incidence of RTIs.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Clinical studies have shown that although probiotics do not influence the incidence of respiratory tract infection, they do reduce the severity of symptoms and duration of the illness.
“clinical studies have shown that although probiotics do not influence the incidence of respiratory tract infection, they do reduce the severity of symptoms and duration of the illness”
From Respiratory viral infection-induced microbiome alterations and secondary bacterial pneumonia. (2018) · cites this paper as [58]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 85 · Cited by 131
- Authors
- Vouloumanou, E. K., Makris, G. C., Karageorgopoulos, D. E., & Falagas, M. E.
- Affiliations
- Alfa Institute of Biomedical Sciences (GR)
- Tufts University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Falagas, Matthew E.
- Venue
- International Journal of Antimicrobial Agents
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2009-09
- Volume
- 34
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 197.e1-197.e10
- ISSN
- 0924-8579 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2088142187
- Cited by
- 131
- References
- 85
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 15
- FWCI
- 1.72
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- International Journal of Antimicrobial Agents (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Probiotics and Fermented Foods
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Emergency Medical Services › Pediatric health and respiratory diseases
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Pneumonia and Respiratory Infections
- Keywords
- probiotics, respiratory infections, infection control, Lactobacillus, Bifidobacterium, Enterococcus faecalis, symptom severity, disease duration, upper respiratory tract infection, lower respiratory tract infection
- MeSH terms
- Bifidobacterium, Humans, Lactobacillus, Respiratory Tract Infections, Enterococcus faecalis, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Probiotics
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review