Cited by 131Probiotics and Fermented FoodsPediatric health and respiratory diseasesPneumonia and Respiratory Infections

Probiotics for the prevention of respiratory tract infections: a systematic review

Vouloumanou, Evridiki K., Makris, Gregory C., Karageorgopoulos, Drosos E., Falagas, Matthew E.·2009·International Journal of Antimicrobial Agents

Abstract

We evaluated the clinical evidence regarding probiotic use for the prevention of respiratory tract infections (RTIs). Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) studying the effects of probiotics for the prevention of upper or lower RTIs were systematically identified. Fourteen RCTs (twelve involving healthy subjects and two involving patients with RTIs) were included. Various Lactobacillus strains were used in seven RCTs, combinations of Lactobacillus and Bifidobacterium strains were used in five RCTs, and a Bifidobacterium strain and a non-pathogenic Enterococcus faecalis strain were used in one RCT, respectively. In ten RCTs no difference was found regarding the incidence of RTIs in the probiotic arm compared with the control arm, whereas the remaining four RCTs favoured the use of probiotics. Reduction in the severity of symptoms related to RTIs was noted in five of six RCTs that provided relevant data. In three of nine RCTs that provided relevant data, the clinical course of RTIs was shorter in the probiotic arm, whereas no difference was found in the remaining six RCTs. In conclusion, probiotics may have a beneficial effect on the severity and duration of symptoms of RTIs but do not appear to reduce the incidence of RTIs.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2008.11.005

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Clinical studies have shown that although probiotics do not influence the incidence of respiratory tract infection, they do reduce the severity of symptoms and duration of the illness.

    “clinical studies have shown that although probiotics do not influence the incidence of respiratory tract infection, they do reduce the severity of symptoms and duration of the illness”

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 85 · Cited by 131

Authors
Vouloumanou, E. K., Makris, G. C., Karageorgopoulos, D. E., & Falagas, M. E.
Affiliations
  • Alfa Institute of Biomedical Sciences (GR)
  • Tufts University (US)
Corresponding author
Falagas, Matthew E.
Venue
International Journal of Antimicrobial Agents
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2009-09
Volume
34
Issue
3
Pages
197.e1-197.e10
ISSN
0924-8579 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2088142187
Cited by
131
References
85
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 15
FWCI
1.72
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • International Journal of Antimicrobial Agents (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Probiotics and Fermented Foods
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Emergency Medical Services › Pediatric health and respiratory diseases
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Pneumonia and Respiratory Infections
Keywords
probiotics, respiratory infections, infection control, Lactobacillus, Bifidobacterium, Enterococcus faecalis, symptom severity, disease duration, upper respiratory tract infection, lower respiratory tract infection
MeSH terms
Bifidobacterium, Humans, Lactobacillus, Respiratory Tract Infections, Enterococcus faecalis, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Probiotics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review