Cited by 163Antibiotic Resistance in BacteriaAntibiotic Use and ResistanceInfections and bacterial resistance

Regional differences and trends in antimicrobial susceptibility of Acinetobacter baumannii

Lob, Sibylle H., Hoban, Daryl J., Sahm, Daniel F., Badal, Robert E.·2016·International Journal of Antimicrobial Agents

Abstract

Acinetobacter baumannii, although representing a small percentage of Gram-negative bacilli isolates in intra-abdominal infections (IAIs) and urinary tract infections (UTIs), is frequently multidrug-resistant (MDR) and can pose difficult therapeutic challenges. From 2011 to 2014, 2337 A. baumannii were collected from IAIs and UTIs at 453 hospital sites in 48 countries as part of the SMART ongoing surveillance initiative. Current susceptibility and multidrug resistance, defined as resistance to at least three of the tested drug classes, were determined in a subset of 1011 isolates from 2013 to 2014. A. baumannii comprised 0.7-4.6% of all aerobic and facultative Gram-negative bacilli isolated in six global regions. MDR rates were lowest in North America (47%) and highest in Europe and the Middle East (>93%), with higher rates in ICUs than in non-ICU wards in almost all regions. Antimicrobial susceptibility profiles varied by region but resistance was high everywhere, with no drug inhibiting >70% of A. baumannii isolates in any region. Susceptibility to imipenem was highest in North America (64%) and lowest in Europe and the Middle East (≤11%). Amikacin overall was the most active of the studied agents, including against MDR isolates (of which 11-38% were susceptible). Trend analysis of only those countries that contributed isolates in each study year (2011-2014) demonstrated an increasing trend in MDR rates in the Middle East as well as decreasing susceptibility to several singl…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2016.01.015

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Mounting evidence demonstrates the emergence of Acinetobacter as a cause of hospital-associated and occasionally community-acquired infection in resource-limited settings.

    “mounting evidence demonstrates the emergence of this pathogen as a cause of hospital-associated and occasionally community-acquired infection in resource-limited settings.[5, 16–20]”

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 30 · Cited by 163

Authors
Lob, S. H., Hoban, D. J., Sahm, D. F., & Badal, R. E.
Corresponding author
Lob, Sibylle H.
Venue
International Journal of Antimicrobial Agents
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2016-04
Volume
47
Issue
4
Pages
317-323
ISSN
0924-8579 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2288514582
Cited by
163
References
30
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 19 · 2021: 19 · 2020: 27 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 5
FWCI
6.38
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • International Journal of Antimicrobial Agents (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp.
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Medicine › Antibiotic Resistance in Bacteria
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology › Antibiotic Use and Resistance
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Endocrinology › Infections and bacterial resistance
Keywords
Acinetobacter baumannii, antimicrobial susceptibility, multidrug resistance, intra-abdominal infection, urinary tract infection, regional variation, imipenem resistance, amikacin, antimicrobial resistance trends, intensive care unit
MeSH terms
Acinetobacter Infections, Anti-Bacterial Agents, Hospitals, Humans, Urinary Tract Infections, Global Health, Drug Resistance, Multiple, Bacterial, Acinetobacter baumannii, Intraabdominal Infections

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review