Regional differences and trends in antimicrobial susceptibility of Acinetobacter baumannii
Abstract
Acinetobacter baumannii, although representing a small percentage of Gram-negative bacilli isolates in intra-abdominal infections (IAIs) and urinary tract infections (UTIs), is frequently multidrug-resistant (MDR) and can pose difficult therapeutic challenges. From 2011 to 2014, 2337 A. baumannii were collected from IAIs and UTIs at 453 hospital sites in 48 countries as part of the SMART ongoing surveillance initiative. Current susceptibility and multidrug resistance, defined as resistance to at least three of the tested drug classes, were determined in a subset of 1011 isolates from 2013 to 2014. A. baumannii comprised 0.7-4.6% of all aerobic and facultative Gram-negative bacilli isolated in six global regions. MDR rates were lowest in North America (47%) and highest in Europe and the Middle East (>93%), with higher rates in ICUs than in non-ICU wards in almost all regions. Antimicrobial susceptibility profiles varied by region but resistance was high everywhere, with no drug inhibiting >70% of A. baumannii isolates in any region. Susceptibility to imipenem was highest in North America (64%) and lowest in Europe and the Middle East (≤11%). Amikacin overall was the most active of the studied agents, including against MDR isolates (of which 11-38% were susceptible). Trend analysis of only those countries that contributed isolates in each study year (2011-2014) demonstrated an increasing trend in MDR rates in the Middle East as well as decreasing susceptibility to several singl…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Mounting evidence demonstrates the emergence of Acinetobacter as a cause of hospital-associated and occasionally community-acquired infection in resource-limited settings.
“mounting evidence demonstrates the emergence of this pathogen as a cause of hospital-associated and occasionally community-acquired infection in resource-limited settings.[5, 16–20]”
From Antimicrobial-resistant infections among postpartum women at a Ugandan referral hospital (2017) · cites this paper as [19]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 30 · Cited by 163
- Authors
- Lob, S. H., Hoban, D. J., Sahm, D. F., & Badal, R. E.
- Corresponding author
- Lob, Sibylle H.
- ORCID
- Lob, Sibylle H.
- Venue
- International Journal of Antimicrobial Agents
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2016-04
- Volume
- 47
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 317-323
- ISSN
- 0924-8579 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2288514582
- Cited by
- 163
- References
- 30
- Citations by year
- 2026: 7 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 19 · 2021: 19 · 2020: 27 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 5
- FWCI
- 6.38
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- International Journal of Antimicrobial Agents (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp.
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Medicine › Antibiotic Resistance in Bacteria
- Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology › Antibiotic Use and Resistance
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Endocrinology › Infections and bacterial resistance
- Keywords
- Acinetobacter baumannii, antimicrobial susceptibility, multidrug resistance, intra-abdominal infection, urinary tract infection, regional variation, imipenem resistance, amikacin, antimicrobial resistance trends, intensive care unit
- MeSH terms
- Acinetobacter Infections, Anti-Bacterial Agents, Hospitals, Humans, Urinary Tract Infections, Global Health, Drug Resistance, Multiple, Bacterial, Acinetobacter baumannii, Intraabdominal Infections
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review