The antifungal arsenal: alternative drugs and future targets
Abstract
Clinically available antifungals for the treatment of invasive fungal infections primarily target either ergosterol in the fungal cell membrane or 1,3-β-D-glucan in the fungal cell wall. These classes include the polyene amphotericin B, the triazoles, and the echinocandins. Although newer antifungals and improved formulations of others have advanced our ability to treat patients with invasive mycoses, these drugs are often limited by toxicities, drug interactions, and the need for intravenous administration. Several investigational agents are currently under development. These include those that also target either ergosterol or 1,3-β-D-glucan, but have advantages over currently available drugs. Among these are the tetrazoles VT-1129, VT-1161, and VT-1598 that are more specific for fungal Cyp51 and less so for mammalian CYP 450 enzymes, the echinocandin CD101 that has an extended half-life, and the glucan synthase inhibitor SCY-078, which is being developed for oral administration. In addition, several agents with novel mechanisms of action are also under development. These include the inositol acyltransferase AX001, the dihydroorotate dehydrogenase inhibitor F901318, and VL-2397, which is similar in structure to the siderophore ferrichrome. In addition to possibly overcoming the limitations of currently available antifungals, these newer agents may be less susceptible to mechanisms of resistance that may render antifungals ineffective. Each of these investigational agents has the potential to improve patient outcomes in the treatment of invasive mycoses.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
At present there are a handful of investigational agents at different stages of the antifungal development pipeline; the majority target ergosterol or 1,3-β-D-glucan, but some novel classes with novel targets and mechanisms are included.
“At the present time there are a handful of investigational agents at different stages of the antifungal development pipeline. Although the majority still target ergosterol (same as azoles) or 1,3-β-D-glucan (same as echinocandins), they also include some novel classes with novel targets and mechanisms [25,39,40].”
From Antifungal therapy of Candida biofilms: Past, present and future (2023) · cites this paper as [40]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 69 · Cited by 149
- Authors
- Wiederhold, N. P.
- Affiliations
- The University of Texas at San Antonio Health Science Center (US)
- Corresponding author
- Wiederhold, Nathan P.
- Venue
- International Journal of Antimicrobial Agents
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2018-03
- Volume
- 51
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 333-339
- ISSN
- 0924-8579 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2750866219
- Cited by
- 149
- References
- 69
- Citations by year
- 2026: 9 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 22 · 2021: 33 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 19 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 2
- FWCI
- 9.47
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- International Journal of Antimicrobial Agents (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Antifungal resistance and susceptibility
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Fungal Plant Pathogen Control
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Fungal Infections and Studies
- Keywords
- antifungal agents, invasive fungal infections, ergosterol, β-1,3-glucan, amphotericin B, triazoles, echinocandins, CYP51, tetrazoles, CD101, dihydroorotate dehydrogenase inhibitors, ferrichrome, drug resistance, drug toxicity
- MeSH terms
- Invasive Fungal Infections, Antifungal Agents, Fungi, Humans, Drug Discovery
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review