Synergistic interactions of sulfamethoxazole and azole antifungal drugs against emerging multidrug-resistant Candida auris
Abstract
Candida auris is an emerging multidrug-resistant pathogen implicated in numerous outbreaks worldwide, with a notably high mortality rate (ca. 60%). A significant challenge with treatment of these infections is the resistance of C. auris to most antifungal drugs used clinically. Thus, finding co-drugs capable of overcoming resistance to frontline antifungals is of prime clinical importance. In this study, the ability of the combination of different sulfa drugs with azole antifungals to inhibit the growth of azole-resistant C. auris isolates was evaluated. Among the active sulfa drugs, sulfamethoxazole exhibited the most potent in vitro synergistic interactions with voriconazole and itraconazole. The sulfamethoxazole-voriconazole combination restored voriconazole's fungistatic activity against three of eight voriconazole-resistant clinical isolates. Similarly, the sulfamethoxazole-itraconazole combination restored itraconazole's fungistatic activity against three of four itraconazole-resistant clinical isolates. This activity was further confirmed in vivo in a Caenorhabditis elegans model of C. auris infection. The sulfamethoxazole-voriconazole combination enhanced survival of nematodes infected with C. auris by nearly 70%. Notably, these data indicate that the efficacy of this novel combination is dependent on the underlying mechanism of azole resistance. Mutant strains demonstrating azole resistance by either overproduction of or decreased affinity for the azole target (ERG11p) were found highly to be susceptible to the sulfamethoxazole-azole combination. However, this synergistic interaction was ineffective against mutant strains that demonstrated azole resistance via efflux pump hyperactivity. In conclusion, sulfamethoxazole represents a promising co-drug that can restore the efficacy of certain azole antifungal drugs against some azole-resistant isolates of C. auris.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Resistance to major antifungal agents, including first-line therapeutics, is common among C. auris isolates.
“Unfortunately, resistance to major antifungal agents, including to the first-line therapeutics, was reported to be common among C. auris isolates [4].”
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 43 · Cited by 90
- Authors
- Eldesouky, H. E., Li, X., Abutaleb, N. S., Mohammad, H., & Seleem, M. N.
- Affiliations
- Purdue University West Lafayette (US)
- Corresponding author
- Seleem, Mohamed N.
- Venue
- International Journal of Antimicrobial Agents
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2018-12
- Volume
- 52
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 754-761
- ISSN
- 0924-8579 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2888748697
- Cited by
- 90
- References
- 43
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 21 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 12
- FWCI
- 8.88
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- International Journal of Antimicrobial Agents (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Health Science Center, University of Tennessee
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Antifungal resistance and susceptibility
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Fungal Plant Pathogen Control
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Fungal and yeast genetics research
- Keywords
- Candida auris, sulfamethoxazole, azole antifungals, voriconazole, itraconazole, drug synergy, antifungal resistance, ERG11, Caenorhabditis elegans infection model, combination therapy
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Antifungal Agents, Candida, Candidiasis, Disease Models, Animal, Drug Synergism, Sulfamethoxazole, Survival Analysis, Treatment Outcome, Caenorhabditis elegans, Itraconazole, Voriconazole
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review