Cited by 150Fungal Biology and ApplicationsPolysaccharides Composition and ApplicationsBiological and pharmacological studies of plants

Comparison on characterization and antioxidant activity of polysaccharides from Ganoderma lucidum by ultrasound and conventional extraction

Kang, Qiaozhen, Chen, Sisi, Li, Shufang, Wang, Bo, Liu, Xin, Hao, Limin, Lu, Jike·2019·International Journal of Biological Macromolecules

Abstract

The polysaccharides of Ganoderma lucidum (GLP) extracted by the methods of ultrasound assisted extraction (UAE) and hot water extraction (HWE) were characterized and the antioxidant activities of GLP UAE and GLP HWE were compared. High performance gel permeation chromatography (HPGPC) showed that the average molecular weight of GLP UAE and GLP HWE were 465.65 kDa and 703.45 kDa, respectively. GLP UAE was composed of mannose, rhamnose, glucose, galactose and arabinose in the molar ratio of 2.58:1.25:11.17:2.5:1, while GLP HWE was composed of the same monosaccharide in the ratio of 3.11:1.11:19.44:2.33:1. GLP HWE showed a relatively higher antioxidant activity than GLP UAE by testing the reducing power, the scavenging ability on 1.1‑diphenyl‑2‑picryl‑hydrazyl (DPPH), hydroxyl radical and cellular protective effect on yeast cells from ultraviolet radiation (UV) damage. GLP UAE and GLP HWE were purified by chromatographic column of DEAE-52 cellulose. GLP UAE, GLP HWE and the purified components could be novel antioxidants for functional food.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2018.11.215

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 37 · Cited by 150

Authors
Kang, Q., Chen, S., Li, S., Wang, B., Liu, X., Hao, L., & Lu, J.
Affiliations
  • Zhengzhou University (CN)
  • PLA Academy of Military Science (CN)
Corresponding author
  • Hao, Limin
  • Lu, Jike
Venue
International Journal of Biological Macromolecules
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2019-03
Volume
124
Pages
1137-1144
ISSN
0141-8130 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2901484929
Cited by
150
References
37
Citations by year
2026: 16 · 2025: 24 · 2024: 24 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 22 · 2021: 25 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 11
FWCI
8.23
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • International Journal of Biological Macromolecules (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Chinese People’s Liberation Army (BX115C007)
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (31201342, 81373119, 81571526)
  • Natural Science Foundation of Henan Province (162300410305)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Fungal Biology and Applications
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Polysaccharides Composition and Applications
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Biological and pharmacological studies of plants
Keywords
Ganoderma lucidum, polysaccharides, ultrasound-assisted extraction, hot water extraction, antioxidant activity, molecular weight, monosaccharide composition, DPPH radical scavenging, hydroxyl radical scavenging, functional food ingredients
MeSH terms
Arabinose, Biphenyl Compounds, Galactose, Glucose, Hot Temperature, Hydrolysis, Mannose, Molecular Weight, Picrates, Radiation-Protective Agents, Rhamnose, Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Sonication, Ultraviolet Rays, Water, Free Radical Scavengers, Hydroxyl Radical, Reishi, Liquid-Liquid Extraction, Fungal Polysaccharides

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review