Chia seed (Salvia hispanica L.) mucilage (a heteropolysaccharide): Functional, thermal, rheological behaviour and its utilization
Abstract
Modern diet lifestyle choices of convenient and nutritious food is really a tedious challenge to work upon by manufacturers as to cope-up with existing line of product formulation. Present investigation also aimed to reveal the thermal, shear and dynamic behaviour of chia seed mucilage and its supplementation at 0, 10, 20, 30 and 40% proportion as fat replacer in cookies development. Chia mucilage solution showed values of n < 1, which indicates the pseudo-plastic and shear thinning behaviour of the mucilage. At the region of low frequency, G″ was observed to be higher than G' for chia seed mucilage and at a certain characteristic frequency, a crossover of frequency versus G' and G″ curves was observed. DSC thermograms of chia mucilage sample showed both endothermic as well as exothermic peak. For the endothermic and exothermic peak, transition temperatures (T o, T p and T e) of chiaseed mucilage was 52.8 °C, 107.9 °C and 215.0 °C and 277.7 °C, 316.8 °C and 354.9 °C, respectively. Highest spread factor, diameter and thickness of cookies were observed in full fat (control) cookies. With the increase in the concentration of chia seed mucilage, the spread factor of cookies decreased from 6.83 to 5.99. The study concluded that supplementation of cookies with 30% mucilage possessed the best texture, desirable color and mouthfeel and thus, found to be highly acceptable as indicated by their overall quality score.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Supplementing cookies with 20% chia seed mucilage gives the best texture and acceptable colour and mouthfeel.
“Punia and Dhull have supplemented cookies with 20% chia seed mucilage; it possessed the best texture and was found to be acceptable regarding colour and mouthfeel [144].”
From Nutritional and Functional New Perspectives and Potential Health Benefits of Quinoa and Chia Seeds (2023) · cites this paper as [144]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 43 · Cited by 122
- Authors
- Punia, S., & Dhull, S. B.
- Affiliations
- Chaudhary Devi Lal University (IN)
- Corresponding author
- Dhull, Sanju Bala
- ORCID
- Dhull, Sanju Bala
- Venue
- International Journal of Biological Macromolecules
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2019-11
- Volume
- 140
- Pages
- 1084-1090
- ISSN
- 0141-8130 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2970942252
- Cited by
- 122
- References
- 43
- Citations by year
- 2026: 15 · 2025: 27 · 2024: 25 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 4
- FWCI
- 7.33
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- International Journal of Biological Macromolecules (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Polysaccharides Composition and Applications
- Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Food composition and properties
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Seed and Plant Biochemistry
- Keywords
- chia seed mucilage, Salvia hispanica, heteropolysaccharide, fat replacers, cookies, rheological properties, shear thinning, viscoelasticity, thermal transitions, spread factor, texture, functional food ingredients
- MeSH terms
- Calorimetry, Differential Scanning, Polysaccharides, Rheology, Sensation, Temperature, Spectroscopy, Fourier Transform Infrared, Salvia, Plant Mucilage, Snacks
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review