Cited by 31Advanced Cellulose Research StudiesLignin and Wood ChemistryNanocomposite Films for Food Packaging

Esterified cellulose nanofibres from saw dust using vegetable oil

Mokhena, T.C., John, M.J.·2020·International Journal of Biological Macromolecules

Abstract

In this work, cellulose nanofibres (CNFs) were extracted from sawdust, which is an underutilized by-product from the wood and timber industry. The extracted CNFs by chemical and mechanical treatments had a web-like structure with diameters ranging between 2 nm and 27 nm and lengths reaching a few microns. The obtained CNFs were further chemically modified with vegetable canola oil using two different esterification processes. In order to compare the effect of the surface modification of CNFs, the nanopapers were prepared from their prospective suspensions through solvent evaporation method, and then characterize with Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy, X-ray diffraction (XRD), thermogravimetric analysis (TGA), UV-vis spectroscopy and tensile tester. FTIR results indicated that both methods led to a successful grafting of the long chain hydrocarbon structure onto the CNFs, and became more hydrophobic when compared to unmodified CNFs-based nanopapers. The crystallinity, mechanical, light transmittance and thermal properties were significantly affected primarily by the esterification method employed, thus the degree of substitution. It was found that high degree of substitution adversely affected the crystallinity, light transmittance, mechanical and thermal properties. The crystallinity decreased from 70% to <40% when the degree of substation was about 0.8.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2020.01.278

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 37 · Cited by 31

Authors
Mokhena, T. C., & John, M. J.
Affiliations
  • Council for Scientific and Industrial Research (ZA)
  • University of the Witwatersrand (ZA)
Corresponding author
  • Mokhena, T.C.
  • John, M.J.
Venue
International Journal of Biological Macromolecules
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-04
Volume
148
Pages
1109-1117
ISSN
0141-8130 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3004312128
Cited by
31
References
37
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 1
FWCI
0.72
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • International Journal of Biological Macromolecules (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Nelson Mandela University Research Repository (submittedVersion)
Funders
Department of Science and Technology, Republic of South Africa
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Biomaterials › Advanced Cellulose Research Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Lignin and Wood Chemistry
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Biomaterials › Nanocomposite Films for Food Packaging
Keywords
cellulose nanofibers, sawdust, vegetable oils, canola oil, esterification, surface modification, nanopaper, solvent evaporation, degree of substitution, crystallinity, hydrophobicity, mechanical properties, thermal properties, optical transmittance, wood industry by-products
MeSH terms
Rapeseed Oil, Cellulose, Crystallization, Esterification, Esters, Hydrocarbons, Solvents, Structure-Activity Relationship, Thermal Conductivity, Wood, Molecular Structure, Mechanical Phenomena, Nanofibers, Hydrophobic and Hydrophilic Interactions

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review