Cited by 67Silk-based biomaterials and applicationsHydrogels: synthesis, properties, applicationsElectrospun Nanofibers in Biomedical Applications

Biomimetic silk fibroin and xanthan gum blended hydrogels for connective tissue regeneration

Byram, Prasanna Kumar, Sunka, Krishna Chaitanya, Barik, Anwesha, Kaushal, Manish, Dhara, Santanu, Chakravorty, Nishant·2020·International Journal of Biological Macromolecules

Abstract

Combination of naturally occurring materials instead of chemically synthesized products has always been an attractive proposition in the field of tissue engineering. In this study, silk fibroin (SF) and xanthan gum(XG) were physically crosslinked to form biocompatible hydrogels. SF/XG hydrogels were prepared using ultrasonication, which induces β-sheets from random coils in SF solution and allows entrapment of heated XG chains homogeneously in the SF network. It is a novel way of blending SF and XG polymers which avoids the usage of chemical crosslinkers. SF/XG blended solutions were used at different ratios for the hydrogel formation. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and micro-computed tomography (MCT) were used for morphological analysis of the interconnected network and porosity of the scaffolds, respectively. Rheological studies were performed to understand the changes in mechanical properties due to the incorporation of XG into SF hydrogels. Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) confirmed the presence of SF and XG moieties in the blend scaffolds. Additionally, thermal Analysis (TGA & DSC) established the homogenous mixture and presence of XG in the SF network without any phase separation. Furthermore, the MTT assay demonstrates the cytocompatibility of scaffolds using L929 fibroblast cells. Thus, fabricated SF/XG scaffolds could mimic natural cartilage ECM by exhibiting enhanced water swelling capacity and suitable porosity along with its cytocompatible studies, indicating its potential application in soft tissue engineering.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2020.09.231

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Byram, P. K., Sunka, K. C., Barik, A., Kaushal, M., Dhara, S., & Chakravorty, N.
Affiliations
Indian Institute of Technology Kharagpur (IN)
Corresponding author
Chakravorty, Nishant
Venue
International Journal of Biological Macromolecules
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-12
Volume
165
Issue
Pt A
Pages
874-882
ISSN
0141-8130 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3089342842
Cited by
67
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 9
FWCI
2.49
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • International Journal of Biological Macromolecules (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Biomaterials › Silk-based biomaterials and applications
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Medicine › Hydrogels: synthesis, properties, applications
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Biomaterials › Electrospun Nanofibers in Biomedical Applications
Keywords
silk fibroin, xanthan gum, hydrogels, connective tissue regeneration, cartilage tissue engineering, physical crosslinking, scaffold porosity, water swelling capacity, mechanical properties, cytocompatibility, L929 fibroblasts, biomimetic scaffolds
MeSH terms
Animals, Cell Line, Fibroblasts, Fibroins, Materials Testing, Polysaccharides, Bacterial, Regeneration, Hydrogels, Biomimetic Materials, Mice

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review