Biomimetic silk fibroin and xanthan gum blended hydrogels for connective tissue regeneration
Abstract
Combination of naturally occurring materials instead of chemically synthesized products has always been an attractive proposition in the field of tissue engineering. In this study, silk fibroin (SF) and xanthan gum(XG) were physically crosslinked to form biocompatible hydrogels. SF/XG hydrogels were prepared using ultrasonication, which induces β-sheets from random coils in SF solution and allows entrapment of heated XG chains homogeneously in the SF network. It is a novel way of blending SF and XG polymers which avoids the usage of chemical crosslinkers. SF/XG blended solutions were used at different ratios for the hydrogel formation. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and micro-computed tomography (MCT) were used for morphological analysis of the interconnected network and porosity of the scaffolds, respectively. Rheological studies were performed to understand the changes in mechanical properties due to the incorporation of XG into SF hydrogels. Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) confirmed the presence of SF and XG moieties in the blend scaffolds. Additionally, thermal Analysis (TGA & DSC) established the homogenous mixture and presence of XG in the SF network without any phase separation. Furthermore, the MTT assay demonstrates the cytocompatibility of scaffolds using L929 fibroblast cells. Thus, fabricated SF/XG scaffolds could mimic natural cartilage ECM by exhibiting enhanced water swelling capacity and suitable porosity along with its cytocompatible studies, indicating its potential application in soft tissue engineering.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Because of hydrogen bonds, the main chain's helical shape coils around the side chain.
“Because of hydrogen bonds, the main chain’s helical shape coils around the side chain [67].”
From Resorbable Biomaterials Used for 3D Scaffolds in Tissue Engineering: A Review (2023) · cites this paper as [67]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Resorbable Biomaterials Used for 3D Scaffolds in Tissue Engineering: A Review
Vach Agocsova, S., Culenova, M., Birova, I., Omanikova, L., Moncmanova, B., Danisovic, L., Ziaran, S., Bakos, D., & Alexy, P. (2023) · Materials · doi:10.3390/ma16124267 · Cited by 98 · see citing works
- Authors
- Byram, P. K., Sunka, K. C., Barik, A., Kaushal, M., Dhara, S., & Chakravorty, N.
- Affiliations
- Indian Institute of Technology Kharagpur (IN)
- Corresponding author
- Chakravorty, Nishant
- Venue
- International Journal of Biological Macromolecules
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2020-12
- Volume
- 165
- Issue
- Pt A
- Pages
- 874-882
- ISSN
- 0141-8130 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3089342842
- Cited by
- 67
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 6 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 9
- FWCI
- 2.49
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- International Journal of Biological Macromolecules (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Biomaterials › Silk-based biomaterials and applications
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Medicine › Hydrogels: synthesis, properties, applications
- Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Biomaterials › Electrospun Nanofibers in Biomedical Applications
- Keywords
- silk fibroin, xanthan gum, hydrogels, connective tissue regeneration, cartilage tissue engineering, physical crosslinking, scaffold porosity, water swelling capacity, mechanical properties, cytocompatibility, L929 fibroblasts, biomimetic scaffolds
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Cell Line, Fibroblasts, Fibroins, Materials Testing, Polysaccharides, Bacterial, Regeneration, Hydrogels, Biomimetic Materials, Mice
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review