Cited by 94Bone Tissue Engineering MaterialsElectrospun Nanofibers in Biomedical Applicationsbiodegradable polymer synthesis and properties

Evaluation of the effects of starch on polyhydroxybutyrate electrospun scaffolds for bone tissue engineering applications

Asl, Maryam Abdollahi, Karbasi, Saeed, Beigi-Boroujeni, Saeed, Zamanlui Benisi, Soheila, Saeed, Mahdi·2021·International Journal of Biological Macromolecules

Abstract

Efficient design for bone tissue engineering requires an understanding of the appropriate selection of biomimetic natural or synthetic materials and scalable fabrication technologies. In this research, poly (3-hydroxybutyrate) (PHB) and starch (5-15 wt%) as biological macromolecules were used to fabricate novel biomimetic scaffolds by electrospinning method. SEM results of electrospun scaffolds revealed bead-free nanofibers and three-dimensional homogenous structures with highly interconnected pores. Results of FTIR and Raman demonstrated that there were hydrogen bonds between the two polymers. The tensile strength of scaffolds was significantly improved by adding starch up to 10 wt%, from 3.05 to 15.54 MPa. In vitro degradation and hydrophilicity of the scaffolds were improved with the presence of starch. The viability and proliferation of MG-63 cells and alkaline phosphatase (ALP) activity were remarkably increased in the PHB-starch scaffolds compared to the PHB and control samples. The mineralization and calcium deposition of MG-63 cells were confirmed by alizarin red staining. It is concluded that PHB/starch electrospun scaffold could be a good candidate for bone tissue engineering applications.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2021.09.078

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Blending PHB with natural polymers such as keratin, gelatin, chitosan, starch, or lignin can improve its physical and biological properties.

    “On the other hand, its blending with natural polymers such as keratin, gelatin, chitosan, starch, or lignin can improve its physical and biological properties [100].”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Asl, M. A., Karbasi, S., Beigi-Boroujeni, S., Zamanlui Benisi, S., & Saeed, M.
Affiliations
  • Islamic Azad University, Tehran (IR)
  • Isfahan University of Medical Sciences (IR)
Corresponding author
Karbasi, Saeed
Venue
International Journal of Biological Macromolecules
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2021-11
Volume
191
Pages
500-513
ISSN
0141-8130 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3198993921
Cited by
94
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 22 · 2024: 23 · 2023: 27 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 1
FWCI
4.56
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • International Journal of Biological Macromolecules (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Bone Tissue Engineering Materials
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Biomaterials › Electrospun Nanofibers in Biomedical Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Biomaterials › biodegradable polymer synthesis and properties
Keywords
polyhydroxybutyrate, starch, electrospun scaffolds, bone tissue engineering, nanofibers, polymer blends, tensile strength, biodegradation, hydrophilicity, MG-63 cells, alkaline phosphatase activity, mineralization, calcium deposition, hydrogen bonding
MeSH terms
Alkaline Phosphatase, Bone Regeneration, Calcium, Cell Line, Cell Survival, Humans, Hydrogen Bonding, Hydroxybutyrates, Starch, Tensile Strength, Tissue Engineering, Tissue Scaffolds

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review