Evaluation of the effects of starch on polyhydroxybutyrate electrospun scaffolds for bone tissue engineering applications
Abstract
Efficient design for bone tissue engineering requires an understanding of the appropriate selection of biomimetic natural or synthetic materials and scalable fabrication technologies. In this research, poly (3-hydroxybutyrate) (PHB) and starch (5-15 wt%) as biological macromolecules were used to fabricate novel biomimetic scaffolds by electrospinning method. SEM results of electrospun scaffolds revealed bead-free nanofibers and three-dimensional homogenous structures with highly interconnected pores. Results of FTIR and Raman demonstrated that there were hydrogen bonds between the two polymers. The tensile strength of scaffolds was significantly improved by adding starch up to 10 wt%, from 3.05 to 15.54 MPa. In vitro degradation and hydrophilicity of the scaffolds were improved with the presence of starch. The viability and proliferation of MG-63 cells and alkaline phosphatase (ALP) activity were remarkably increased in the PHB-starch scaffolds compared to the PHB and control samples. The mineralization and calcium deposition of MG-63 cells were confirmed by alizarin red staining. It is concluded that PHB/starch electrospun scaffold could be a good candidate for bone tissue engineering applications.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Blending PHB with natural polymers such as keratin, gelatin, chitosan, starch, or lignin can improve its physical and biological properties.
“On the other hand, its blending with natural polymers such as keratin, gelatin, chitosan, starch, or lignin can improve its physical and biological properties [100].”
From Resorbable Biomaterials Used for 3D Scaffolds in Tissue Engineering: A Review (2023) · cites this paper as [100]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Resorbable Biomaterials Used for 3D Scaffolds in Tissue Engineering: A Review
Vach Agocsova, S., Culenova, M., Birova, I., Omanikova, L., Moncmanova, B., Danisovic, L., Ziaran, S., Bakos, D., & Alexy, P. (2023) · Materials · doi:10.3390/ma16124267 · Cited by 98 · see citing works
- Authors
- Asl, M. A., Karbasi, S., Beigi-Boroujeni, S., Zamanlui Benisi, S., & Saeed, M.
- Affiliations
- Islamic Azad University, Tehran (IR)
- Isfahan University of Medical Sciences (IR)
- Corresponding author
- Karbasi, Saeed
- Venue
- International Journal of Biological Macromolecules
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2021-11
- Volume
- 191
- Pages
- 500-513
- ISSN
- 0141-8130 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3198993921
- Cited by
- 94
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 11 · 2025: 22 · 2024: 23 · 2023: 27 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 1
- FWCI
- 4.56
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- Locations
- International Journal of Biological Macromolecules (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Bone Tissue Engineering Materials
- Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Biomaterials › Electrospun Nanofibers in Biomedical Applications
- Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Biomaterials › biodegradable polymer synthesis and properties
- Keywords
- polyhydroxybutyrate, starch, electrospun scaffolds, bone tissue engineering, nanofibers, polymer blends, tensile strength, biodegradation, hydrophilicity, MG-63 cells, alkaline phosphatase activity, mineralization, calcium deposition, hydrogen bonding
- MeSH terms
- Alkaline Phosphatase, Bone Regeneration, Calcium, Cell Line, Cell Survival, Humans, Hydrogen Bonding, Hydroxybutyrates, Starch, Tensile Strength, Tissue Engineering, Tissue Scaffolds
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review