Cited by 57Bone Tissue Engineering Materials3D Printing in Biomedical ResearchAdditive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies

The effect of polyethylene glycol on printability, physical and mechanical properties and osteogenic potential of 3D-printed poly (l-lactic acid)/polyethylene glycol scaffold for bone tissue engineering

Salehi, Saiedeh, Ghomi, Hamed, Hassanzadeh-Tabrizi, S.A., Koupaei, Narjes, Khodaei, Mohammad·2022·International Journal of Biological Macromolecules

Abstract

One of the challenges in critical size bone defect repairing is the use of a porous degradable scaffold with appropriate properties to the host tissue. Nowadays, the three-dimensional (3D) printing method can produce custom and personalized scaffolds and overcome the problems of traditional methods by controlling the porosity and dimensions of biomaterial scaffolds. In this study, polylactic acid/polyethylene glycol (PLA/PEG) scaffolds were prepared with different PEG percentages (0, 5, 10, 15 and 20 wt%) by fused deposition modeling (FDM) to optimize printability and achieve suitable physico-mechanical properties and also enhance cellular behavior for bone tissue engineering and actually, this study complements previous studies. Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR), Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) were employed for chemical, morphological and thermal evaluations, respectively. It was shown that the adding of 20 wt% PEG to PLA 3D printed scaffolds reduced water contact angle (from 78.16 ± 3.27 to 60.00 ± 2.16), and increased surface wettability. The results also showed that the mechanical properties of the printed scaffolds were not significantly reduced by adding 5 and 10 wt% of PEG. The addition of PEG increased the degradability of scaffolds during immersion in phosphate buffer saline (PBS) solution for 8 weeks and PLA/PEG20 scaffold with 50.96 % had the highest rate of degradation. MTT assay showed that none of the…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2022.09.027

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • PLA/PEG blend could also be potentially used in TE of bone.

    “In addition, PLA/PEG blend could also be potentially used in TE of bone.”
  • This type of material could be adjusted for 3D printing technology, and thus achieve the engineering of patient-tailored bone grafts.

    “It means that this type of material could be adjusted for 3D printing technology, and thus achieve the engineering of patient-tailored bone grafts [173,174,175].”
  • Due to the low melting point, PEG in the PLA/PEG blend can act as a plasticizer, which affects the processability.

    “Moreover, due to the low melting point, PEG in the blend can act as a plasticizer, which affects the processability [173].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Salehi, S., Ghomi, H., Hassanzadeh-Tabrizi, S. A., Koupaei, N., & Khodaei, M.
Affiliations
  • Islamic Azad University of Najafabad (IR)
  • Isfahan University of Technology (IR)
Corresponding author
  • Ghomi, Hamed
  • Hassanzadeh-Tabrizi, S.A.
Venue
International Journal of Biological Macromolecules
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2022-11
Volume
221
Pages
1325-1334
ISSN
0141-8130 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4295204180
Cited by
57
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 19 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 1
FWCI
3.19
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • International Journal of Biological Macromolecules (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Bone Tissue Engineering Materials
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › 3D Printing in Biomedical Research
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Automotive Engineering › Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies
Keywords
polyethylene glycol, polylactic acid, 3D-printed bone scaffolds, fused deposition modeling, printability, wettability, mechanical properties, biodegradation, osteogenic differentiation, MG-63 cells, bone tissue engineering, critical-size bone defect
MeSH terms
Osteogenesis, Polyesters, Polyethylene Glycols, Porosity, Lactic Acid, Tissue Engineering, Tissue Scaffolds, Printing, Three-Dimensional

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review