Bacterial cellulose in cosmetic innovation: A review
Abstract
Bacterial cellulose (BC) emerges as a versatile biomaterial with a myriad of industrial applications, particularly within the cosmetics sector. The absence of hemicellulose, lignin, and pectin in its pure cellulose structure enables favorable interactions with both hydrophilic and hydrophobic biopolymers. This enhances compatibility with active ingredients commonly employed in cosmetics, such as antioxidants, vitamins, and botanical extracts. Recent progress in BC-based materials, which encompasses membranes, films, gels, nanocrystals, and nanofibers, highlights its significant potential in cosmetics. In this context, BC not only serves as a carrier for active ingredients but also plays a crucial role as a structural agent in formulations. The sustainability of BC production and processing is a central focus, highlighting the need for innovative approaches to strengthen scalability and cost-effectiveness. Future research endeavors, including the exploration of novel cultivation strategies and functionalization techniques, aim to maximize BC's therapeutic potential while broadening its scope in personalized skincare regimes. Therefore, this review emphasizes the crucial contribution of BC to the cosmetics sector, underlining its role in fostering innovation, sustainability, and ethical skincare practices. By integrating recent research findings and industry trends, this review proposes a fresh approach to advancing both skincare science and environmental responsibility in the…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Bacterial cellulose synthesized by Gluconacetobacter xylinus features a highly pure nanofibrillar structure, offering high porosity, elasticity, and crystallinity.
“In contrast, bacterial cellulose (BC), synthesized by Gluconacetobacter xylinus, features a highly pure nanofibrillar structure, offering high porosity, elasticity, and crystallinity (Figure 7A) [129,130].”
From Biomaterials in Postoperative Adhesion Barriers and Uterine Tissue Engineering (2025) · cites this paper as [129]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Biomaterials in Postoperative Adhesion Barriers and Uterine Tissue Engineering
Fazel Anvari-Yazdi, A., Badea, I., & Chen, X. (2025) · Gels · doi:10.3390/gels11060441 · Cited by 20 · see citing works
- Authors
- Lima, N. F., Maciel, G. M., Lima, N. P., Fernandes, I. D. A. A., & Haminiuk, C. W. I.
- Affiliations
- Universidade Federal do Paraná (BR)
- Universidade Tecnológica Federal do Paraná (BR)
- Corresponding author
- Haminiuk, Charles Windson Isidoro
- ORCID
- Venue
- International Journal of Biological Macromolecules
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2024-08
- Volume
- 275
- Issue
- Pt 2
- Pages
- 133396
- ISSN
- 0141-8130 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4400174327
- Cited by
- 36
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 11 · 2025: 24 · 2024: 1
- FWCI
- 0.98
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- Locations
- International Journal of Biological Macromolecules (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior
- Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (308603/ 2022-2, 309996/2022-8)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Biomaterials › Advanced Cellulose Research Studies
- Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Biomaterials › Nanocomposite Films for Food Packaging
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Building and Construction › Dyeing and Modifying Textile Fibers
- Keywords
- bacterial cellulose, cosmetics, biomaterials, active ingredient delivery, nanocrystals, nanofibers, gels, sustainable production, personalized skincare, cultivation strategies, functionalization
- MeSH terms
- Sustainable Growth, Bacteria, Cellulose, Cosmetics, Fermentation, Government Regulation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review