Cited by 15Bone Tissue Engineering Materialsbiodegradable polymer synthesis and properties3D Printing in Biomedical Research

Bimodal macroporous 3D scaffolds based on compatibilized PCL and PLA blend using PCL-PEG-PCL block copolymers and cellulose nanocrystals for osteogenic differentiation of hMSCs

Nourany, Mohammad, Makaremy, Amin, Bazrpash, Sina, Hosseini, Saadi·2025·International Journal of Biological Macromolecules

Abstract

In recent years, attempts were made to develop biomaterials using synthetic and natural polymers to induce osteogenesis of human mesenchymal stem cells (hMSCs). Poly(ε-caprolactone) (PCL) is one of the few synthetic polymers with the potential to differentiate hMSCs to bone. However, its potential is limited, attributed to its low strength ; its fast crystallization rate also compromises its dimensional stability. Polylactic acid (PLA) is another synthetic biocompatible polymer with low crystallinity and high rigidity widely used in biomedical engineering . It's commonly added to PCL to limit its shrinkage. However, they are incompatible. Here, the PCL: PLA (70: 30) blend was prepared and three PCL-PEG x -PCL block copolymers (BCPs) and cellulose nanocrystals (CNCs) were employed to improve their compatibility. Bone is a natural porous structure and here, by limiting shrinkage of PCL, potential of the blends to yield stable three- dimensional (3D) scaffolds with interconnected pores was studied. Salt leaching and thermally- induced phase separation was used to produce 3D scaffolds. CNCs were efficient in tuning pore morphology through cell- wall stabilization once the optimal BCP improved the interfacial interaction and reduced the viscosity . The results showed the blends possessed osteoinductive potential. However, the CNC nanocomposites were quite successful at intensifying biomineralization process .

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2025.140149

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 76 · Cited by 15

Authors
Nourany, M., Makaremy, A., Bazrpash, S., & Hosseini, S.
Affiliations
  • Amirkabir University of Technology (IR)
  • Pasteur Institute of Iran (IR)
Corresponding author
Nourany, Mohammad
Venue
International Journal of Biological Macromolecules
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2025-04
Volume
299
Pages
140149
ISSN
0141-8130 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4406699299
Cited by
15
References
76
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 9
FWCI
3.67
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • International Journal of Biological Macromolecules (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Bone Tissue Engineering Materials
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Biomaterials › biodegradable polymer synthesis and properties
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › 3D Printing in Biomedical Research
Keywords
polycaprolactone, polylactic acid, polymer blend compatibility, human mesenchymal stem cells, osteogenic differentiation, cellulose nanocrystals, salt leaching, thermally induced phase separation, biomineralization, bone tissue engineering, pore morphology
MeSH terms
Biocompatible Materials, Cell Differentiation, Cellulose, Humans, Osteogenesis, Polyesters, Polyethylene Glycols, Porosity, Tissue Engineering, Nanoparticles, Tissue Scaffolds, Mesenchymal Stem Cells

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review