Cited by 9biodegradable polymer synthesis and propertiesAdvanced Cellulose Research StudiesNatural Fiber Reinforced Composites

Molecular engineering of nanocellulose-poly(lactic acid) bio-nanocomposite interface by reactive surface grafting from copolymerization

Open access
Ye, Gaoyuan, Yong, Qiwen, Hu, Liqiu, Rosqvist, Emil, Peltonen, Jouko, Hu, Yingcheng, Xu, Wenyang, Xu, Chunlin·2025·International Journal of Biological Macromolecules

Abstract

Poly(lactic acid) (PLA) is a widely reusable polymer, but its practical applications are greatly constrained by low toughness and poor crystallinity. In this study, the modified cellulose nanocrystal (CNC) was designed as a reinforcement through surface copolymerization of caprolactone (CL) and allyl caprolactone (ACL) to enhance the properties of PLA. The surface molecular engineering of reactive core-shell nanofillers (allyl polycaprolactone-grafted CNC, or CNC-g-APCL) effectively improved the interfacial compatibility between PLA and CNC through a straightforward in situ reactive extrusion process. The presence of elastic polycaprolactone (PCL) and allyl polycaprolactone (APCL) rendered good energy dissipation as evidenced by the improved toughness and elongation at break of the PLA/CNC hybrid composites. More importantly, the integrated CNC composite presented an extremely high crystallinity of 45.1%, which is top-ranking among all reported studies on PLA/CNC nanocomposites. In summary, this research introduces an innovative method for designing nanocomposites with improved interfacial compatibility between the matrix and components by grafting copolymerization and reactive extrusion, providing a universal solution to the mechanical and crystalline deficiencies often observed in biodegradable polymers.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2025.141371

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 54 · Cited by 9

Authors
Ye, G., Yong, Q., Hu, L., Rosqvist, E., Peltonen, J., Hu, Y., Xu, W., & Xu, C.
Affiliations
  • Zhejiang A & F University (CN)
  • Åbo Akademi University (FI)
  • Northeast Forestry University (CN)
Corresponding author
  • Hu, Yingcheng
  • Xu, Wenyang
  • Xu, Chunlin
Venue
International Journal of Biological Macromolecules
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2025-05
Volume
306
Issue
Pt 1
Pages
141371
ISSN
0141-8130 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4407836470
Cited by
9
References
54
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 4
FWCI
1.87
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • International Journal of Biological Macromolecules (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Åbo Akademi University Research Portal (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • Academy of Finland (349109)
  • Scientific Research Foundation of Zhejiang A and F University (2023LFR079)
  • Jane and Aatos Erkko Fundation
  • China Scholarship Council (202006600016, 201908120107)
  • Psychoanalytic Center of the Carolinas
  • Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (2572020AW46)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Biomaterials › biodegradable polymer synthesis and properties
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Biomaterials › Advanced Cellulose Research Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Polymers and Plastics › Natural Fiber Reinforced Composites
Keywords
polylactic acid, cellulose nanocrystals, bionanocomposites, graft copolymerization, polycaprolactone, reactive extrusion, interfacial compatibility, toughness, crystallinity, biodegradable polymers
MeSH terms
Cellulose, Polyesters, Surface Properties, Nanoparticles, Nanocomposites, Polymerization

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review