Molecular engineering of nanocellulose-poly(lactic acid) bio-nanocomposite interface by reactive surface grafting from copolymerization
Open accessAbstract
Poly(lactic acid) (PLA) is a widely reusable polymer, but its practical applications are greatly constrained by low toughness and poor crystallinity. In this study, the modified cellulose nanocrystal (CNC) was designed as a reinforcement through surface copolymerization of caprolactone (CL) and allyl caprolactone (ACL) to enhance the properties of PLA. The surface molecular engineering of reactive core-shell nanofillers (allyl polycaprolactone-grafted CNC, or CNC-g-APCL) effectively improved the interfacial compatibility between PLA and CNC through a straightforward in situ reactive extrusion process. The presence of elastic polycaprolactone (PCL) and allyl polycaprolactone (APCL) rendered good energy dissipation as evidenced by the improved toughness and elongation at break of the PLA/CNC hybrid composites. More importantly, the integrated CNC composite presented an extremely high crystallinity of 45.1%, which is top-ranking among all reported studies on PLA/CNC nanocomposites. In summary, this research introduces an innovative method for designing nanocomposites with improved interfacial compatibility between the matrix and components by grafting copolymerization and reactive extrusion, providing a universal solution to the mechanical and crystalline deficiencies often observed in biodegradable polymers.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Grafting PLA chains onto NC surfaces results in more homogeneous composites and superior mechanical behavior.
“Grafting of PLA chains onto NC surfaces results in more homogeneous composites and superior mechanical behavior [80].”
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 54 · Cited by 9
- Authors
- Ye, G., Yong, Q., Hu, L., Rosqvist, E., Peltonen, J., Hu, Y., Xu, W., & Xu, C.
- Affiliations
- Zhejiang A & F University (CN)
- Åbo Akademi University (FI)
- Northeast Forestry University (CN)
- Corresponding author
- Hu, Yingcheng
- Xu, Wenyang
- Xu, Chunlin
- Venue
- International Journal of Biological Macromolecules
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2025-05
- Volume
- 306
- Issue
- Pt 1
- Pages
- 141371
- ISSN
- 0141-8130 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4407836470
- Cited by
- 9
- References
- 54
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 4
- FWCI
- 1.87
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- International Journal of Biological Macromolecules (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Åbo Akademi University Research Portal (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Funders
- Academy of Finland (349109)
- Scientific Research Foundation of Zhejiang A and F University (2023LFR079)
- Jane and Aatos Erkko Fundation
- China Scholarship Council (202006600016, 201908120107)
- Psychoanalytic Center of the Carolinas
- Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (2572020AW46)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Biomaterials › biodegradable polymer synthesis and properties
- Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Biomaterials › Advanced Cellulose Research Studies
- Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Polymers and Plastics › Natural Fiber Reinforced Composites
- Keywords
- polylactic acid, cellulose nanocrystals, bionanocomposites, graft copolymerization, polycaprolactone, reactive extrusion, interfacial compatibility, toughness, crystallinity, biodegradable polymers
- MeSH terms
- Cellulose, Polyesters, Surface Properties, Nanoparticles, Nanocomposites, Polymerization
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review