MF-ProtDisMap: protein real-valued distance prediction with fusion of sequence and coevolutionary features
Open accessPublished version of a preprint
Abstract
The precise estimation of protein inter-residue distances is essential for high-accuracy protein structure modeling. Currently, the prediction methods are predominantly based on MSA-derived coevolutionary features or language model-based sequence features. To effectively leverage the strengths of both methods, this study developed MF-ProtDisMap (Multi-Feature Protein Distance Map), an integrative framework that effectively combines both feature types to achieve superior real-valued distance prediction. Briefly, MSA Transformer is employed to extract the coevolutionary features from protein multiple sequence alignments, whereas ESM2 is used to capture long-range interactions and sequence-level features. To reduce the computational cost while maximizing the representation of fused feature information, we adopt group pooling for feature dimensionality reduction and introduce Diff-former-a novel module combining a diffusion model with a triangular attention mechanism to enhance representation learning. MF-ProtDisMap achieved a MAE of 2.20 Å and an RMSE of 3.40 Å in the protein real-valued distance prediction task. The predicted distances can be converted into contact results, achieving ROC and PR values of 84.56 % and 81.01 %, respectively. These results demonstrate that MF-ProtDisMap outperforms state-of-the-art real-valued protein distance methods.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Highly accurate protein structure prediction with AlphaFold
Jumper, J., Evans, R., Pritzel, A., Green, T., Figurnov, M., Ronneberger, O., Tunyasuvunakool, K., Bates, R., Žídek, A., Potapenko, A., et al. (2021) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-021-03819-2 · Cited by 43,764 · see citing works
Evolutionary-scale prediction of atomic level protein structure with a language model
Lin, Z., Akin, H., Rao, R., Hie, B., Zhu, Z., Lu, W., Smetanin, N., Verkuil, R., Kabeli, O., Shmueli, Y., et al. (2022) · doi:10.1101/2022.07.20.500902 · Cited by 5,523 · see citing works
De novo design of protein structure and function with RFdiffusion
Watson, J. L., Juergens, D., Bennett, N. R., Trippe, B. L., Yim, J., Eisenach, H. E., Ahern, W., Borst, A. J., Ragotte, R. J., Milles, L. F., et al. (2023) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-023-06415-8 · Cited by 2,325 · see citing works
Accurate De Novo Prediction of Protein Contact Map by Ultra-Deep Learning Model
Wang, S., Sun, S., Li, Z., Zhang, R., & Xu, J. (2017) · PLOS Computational Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005324 · Cited by 931 · see citing works
Self-citationAutomated model building and protein identification in cryo-EM maps
Jamali, K., Käll, L., Zhang, R., Brown, A., Kimanius, D., & Scheres, S. H. W. (2023) · doi:10.1101/2023.05.16.541002 · Cited by 686 · see citing works
Rao, R., Liu, J., Verkuil, R., Meier, J., Canny, J. F., Abbeel, P., Sercu, T., & Rives, A. (2021) · doi:10.1101/2021.02.12.430858 · Cited by 350 · see citing works
rawMSA: End-to-end Deep Learning using raw Multiple Sequence Alignments
Mirabello, C., & Wallner, B. (2019) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0220182 · Cited by 105 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
- Authors
- Zhang, Y., Zhong, S., Xu, S., Wang, Z., Xin, C., Ni, F., Yan, F., Lu, X., Sun, S., Wang, H., & Zhang, L.
- Affiliations
- Shandong Agricultural University (CN)
- Xiamen University (CN)
- Beijing Institute for General Artificial Intelligence (CN)
- Corresponding author
- Wang, Hongwei
- Zhang, Liang
- Venue
- International Journal of Biological Macromolecules
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2025-11
- Volume
- 328
- Issue
- Pt 2
- Pages
- 147637
- ISSN
- 0141-8130 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4414121978
- Cited by
- 1
- References
- 7
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1
- FWCI
- 0.30
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- International Journal of Biological Macromolecules (publishedVersion)
- bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Natural Science Foundation of Shandong Province (ZR2021YQ19)
- Shandong Agricultural University
- National Key Research and Development Program of China (2022YFF1001504)
- National Natural Science Foundation of China (62202281, U23A20181)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Machine Learning in Bioinformatics
- Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Enzyme Structure and Function
- Keywords
- multiple sequence alignment, ESM-2, feature fusion, diffusion models, protein contact prediction, protein structure modeling
- MeSH terms
- Prediction Algorithms, Algorithms, Amino Acid Sequence, Models, Molecular, Protein Conformation, Proteins, Sequence Alignment, Evolution, Molecular, Computational Biology
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review