Preparation, characterization and freeze-drying protective mechanisms of natural polysaccharides as emerging lyoprotectants: A review
Abstract
Natural polysaccharides have gained considerable attention in food, pharmaceutical and biomedical applications due to their inherent renewability, biodegradability, biocompatibility, structural and functional diversity. Recently, increasing evidence has demonstrated that polysaccharides can serve as effective freeze-drying protectants for microorganisms, cells, proteins and other bioactive substances. Therefore, preparation and characterization of natural polysaccharides, and clarifying the mechanism of their freeze-drying protective effects are of great significance. This review systematically summarizes the extraction, purification and structural characterization of natural polysaccharides from plant and microbial sources. It particularly emphasizes the freeze-drying protective activity of polysaccharides and the underlying mechanism. Various extraction techniques including acid/alkali extraction, ultrasonic-assisted extraction, microwave-assisted extraction, ultrahigh pressure extraction, subcritical water extraction and enzymatic extraction have been developed to improve polysaccharide yield and quality. Property characterization is mainly achieved through analyses of molecular weight, monosaccharide composition, glycosidic linkage and morphology. In addition, polysaccharides possess freeze-drying protective property mainly through inhibition of ice crystal growth and ice recrystallization, vitrification and water replacement hypothesis. This review may provide theoretical guidance for the development of efficient, sustainable and multifunctional natural polysaccharides as lyoprotectants.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Mirzadeh, M., Arianejad, M. R., & Khedmat, L. (2020) · Carbohydrate Polymers · doi:10.1016/j.carbpol.2019.115421 · Cited by 337 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
- Authors
- Zhang, M., Hao, L., Wang, Z., Yang, H., Zhou, R., Jiang, G., & Wu, C.
- Affiliations
- Sichuan University (CN)
- Corresponding author
- Wu, Chongde
- ORCID
- Hao, Liying
- Venue
- International Journal of Biological Macromolecules
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2026-11
- Volume
- 384
- Issue
- Pt 1
- Pages
- 154838
- ISSN
- 0141-8130 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W7221557368
- Cited by
- 0
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- Locations
- International Journal of Biological Macromolecules (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Natural Science Foundation of Sichuan Province (2025ZNSFSC1051)
- National Natural Science Foundation of China (32272280)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Polysaccharides Composition and Applications
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Microencapsulation and Drying Processes
- Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Biomaterials › Nanocomposite Films for Food Packaging
- Keywords
- natural polysaccharides, lyoprotectants, polysaccharide extraction, polysaccharide purification, polysaccharide structural characterization, ice recrystallization inhibition, ice crystal growth inhibition, vitrification, ultrasound-assisted extraction, microwave-assisted extraction, subcritical water extraction, enzymatic extraction, plant polysaccharides, microbial polysaccharides
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
