Monocyte-to-high density lipoprotein ratio (MHR) can predict the significance of angiographically intermediate coronary lesions
Open accessAbstract
Purpose: Monocyte-high density lipoprotein ratio (MHR) has recently emerged as a marker of inflammation and oxidative stress in the cardiovascular disease. We aimed to investigate whether baseline MHR is associated with functional significance of intermediate coronary artery lesions.\nMethods: Three hundred and one consecutive patients, 215 males and 86 females, who underwent fractional flow reserve (FFR) measurement for angiographically intermediate coronary stenosis (40–70% in quantitative coronary analysis) in the left anterior descending coronary artery were enrolled into the study. An FFR value of ≤0.80 was accepted for hemodynamic significance.\nResults: Of the 301 patients, 115 (38.2%) exhibited significant functional stenosis (FFR ≤ 0.80) in the FFR measurement. Patients with hemodynamically significant lesions had higher MHR values (11.6 ± 3.3 vs. 12.6 ± 2.5 p = 0.003).In stepwise multivariate logistic regression analysis, total cholesterol (OR = 1.008, 95% CI = 1.002–1.013, p < 0.010), plateletcrit (OR = 1.310, 95% CI = 1.097–1.564, p = 0.013) and MHR (OR = 2.993, 95% CI = 1.365–6.561, p = 0.008) were independent predictors of significant functional stenosis. An MHR value of 12.1 had 65% sensitivity and 55% specificity for prediction of hemodynamically significant coronary artery stenosis.\nConclusions: Increased MHR values were associated with functional significance of angiographically intermediate coronary artery stenosis.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
An MHR cut-off equal to 12.1 has been identified as capable of accurately predicting the presence of hemodynamically significant coronary stenoses.
“In particular, an MHR cut-off equal to 12.1 has been identified as being capable of accurately predicting the presence of hemodynamically significant coronary stenoses [27].”
From Residual Cardiovascular Risk: Role of Remnants Cholesterol, Monocyte/HDL Ratio and Lipoprotein Ratios on Personalized Cardiovascular Prevention (2024) · cites this paper as [27]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 38 · Cited by 29
- Authors
- Korkmaz, A., Demir, M., Unal, S., Yildiz, A., Ozyazgan, B., Demirtas, B., Elalmis, O. U., Ileri, M., & Guray, U.
- Affiliations
- Ankara Numune Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi (TR)
- Venue
- International Journal of the Cardiovascular Academy
- Publisher
- Galenos Yayinevi
- Published
- 2017-03
- Volume
- 3
- Issue
- 1-2
- Pages
- 16-20
- ISSN
- 2405-8181 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2615105382
- Cited by
- 29
- References
- 38
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 3
- FWCI
- 3.09
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- International Journal of the Cardiovascular Academy (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Coronary Interventions and Diagnostics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Lipoproteins and Cardiovascular Health
- Keywords
- monocyte-to-HDL cholesterol ratio, intermediate coronary artery stenosis, fractional flow reserve, hemodynamically significant stenosis, inflammatory markers, oxidative stress, left anterior descending artery, plateletcrit, total cholesterol, risk prediction
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review