Cited by 29Coronary Interventions and DiagnosticsCardiac Imaging and DiagnosticsLipoproteins and Cardiovascular Health

Monocyte-to-high density lipoprotein ratio (MHR) can predict the significance of angiographically intermediate coronary lesions

Open access
Korkmaz, Ahmet, Demir, Mevlut, Unal, Sefa, Yildiz, Abdulkadir, Ozyazgan, Burcu, Demirtas, Bekir, Elalmis, Ozgul Ucar, Ileri, Mehmet +1 more·2017·International Journal of the Cardiovascular Academy

Abstract

Purpose: Monocyte-high density lipoprotein ratio (MHR) has recently emerged as a marker of inflammation and oxidative stress in the cardiovascular disease. We aimed to investigate whether baseline MHR is associated with functional significance of intermediate coronary artery lesions.\nMethods: Three hundred and one consecutive patients, 215 males and 86 females, who underwent fractional flow reserve (FFR) measurement for angiographically intermediate coronary stenosis (40–70% in quantitative coronary analysis) in the left anterior descending coronary artery were enrolled into the study. An FFR value of ≤0.80 was accepted for hemodynamic significance.\nResults: Of the 301 patients, 115 (38.2%) exhibited significant functional stenosis (FFR ≤ 0.80) in the FFR measurement. Patients with hemodynamically significant lesions had higher MHR values (11.6 ± 3.3 vs. 12.6 ± 2.5 p = 0.003).In stepwise multivariate logistic regression analysis, total cholesterol (OR = 1.008, 95% CI = 1.002–1.013, p < 0.010), plateletcrit (OR = 1.310, 95% CI = 1.097–1.564, p = 0.013) and MHR (OR = 2.993, 95% CI = 1.365–6.561, p = 0.008) were independent predictors of significant functional stenosis. An MHR value of 12.1 had 65% sensitivity and 55% specificity for prediction of hemodynamically significant coronary artery stenosis.\nConclusions: Increased MHR values were associated with functional significance of angiographically intermediate coronary artery stenosis.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ijcac.2017.05.008

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 38 · Cited by 29

Authors
Korkmaz, A., Demir, M., Unal, S., Yildiz, A., Ozyazgan, B., Demirtas, B., Elalmis, O. U., Ileri, M., & Guray, U.
Affiliations
Ankara Numune Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi (TR)
Venue
International Journal of the Cardiovascular Academy
Published
2017-03
Volume
3
Issue
1-2
Pages
16-20
ISSN
2405-8181 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2615105382
Cited by
29
References
38
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 3
FWCI
3.09
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • International Journal of the Cardiovascular Academy (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Coronary Interventions and Diagnostics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Lipoproteins and Cardiovascular Health
Keywords
monocyte-to-HDL cholesterol ratio, intermediate coronary artery stenosis, fractional flow reserve, hemodynamically significant stenosis, inflammatory markers, oxidative stress, left anterior descending artery, plateletcrit, total cholesterol, risk prediction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review