Cited by 98Cardiovascular Health and Disease PreventionNutritional Studies and DietLipoproteins and Cardiovascular Health

Egg consumption and endothelial function: a randomized controlled crossover trial

Katz, David L., Evans, Marian A., Nawaz, Haq, Njike, Valentine Yanchou, Chan, Wendy, Comerford, Beth Patton, Hoxley, Martha L.·2005·International Journal of Cardiology

Abstract

Background Because of egg cholesterol content, reduction in egg consumption is generally recommended to reduce risk of cardiovascular disease. Recently, however, evidence has been accumulating to suggest that dietary cholesterol is less relevant to cardiovascular risk than dietary saturated fat. This randomized controlled crossover trial was conducted to determine the effects of egg ingestion on endothelial function, a reliable index of cardiovascular risk.Methods Forty-nine healthy adults (mean age 56 years, 40% females) underwent a baseline brachial artery reactivity study (BARS), and were assigned to two eggs or oats daily for 6 weeks in random sequence with a 4-week washout. A BARS was done at the end of each treatment phase, measuring flow-mediated vasodilation (FMD) in the brachial artery using a high-frequency ultrasound.Results FMD was stable in both egg and oat groups, and between-treatment differences were not significant (egg -0.96%, oatmeal -0.79%; p value >0.05). Six weeks of egg ingestion had no effect on total cholesterol (baseline: 203.8 mg/dl; post-treatment: 205.3) or LDL (baseline: 124.8 mg/dl; post-treatment: 129.1). In contrast, 6 weeks of oats lowered total cholesterol (to 194 mg/dl; p = 0.0017) and LDL (to 116.6 mg/dl; p = 0.012). There were no differences in body mass index (BMI), triglyceride, HDL or SBP levels between egg and oat treatment assignments.Conclusion Short-term egg consumption does not adversely affect endothelial function in healthy adults, supporting the view that dietary cholesterol may be less detrimental to cardiovascular health than previously thought.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ijcard.2003.11.028

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 40 · Cited by 98

Authors
Katz, D. L., Evans, M. A., Nawaz, H., Njike, V. Y., Chan, W., Comerford, B. P., & Hoxley, M. L.
Affiliations
Yale University (US)
Corresponding author
Katz, David L.
Venue
International Journal of Cardiology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2005-03
Volume
99
Issue
1
Pages
65-70
ISSN
0167-5273 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2127089652
Cited by
98
References
40
Citations by year
2025: 3 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 6
FWCI
2.96
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • International Journal of Cardiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • U.S. Department of Agriculture
  • Egg Nutrition Center
  • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (U48/CCU115802-03)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiovascular Health and Disease Prevention
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Nutritional Studies and Diet
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Lipoproteins and Cardiovascular Health
Keywords
egg consumption, endothelial function, dietary cholesterol, flow-mediated dilation, brachial artery reactivity, oat, LDL cholesterol, total cholesterol, cardiovascular risk, saturated fat
MeSH terms
Diet, Eggs, Endothelium, Vascular, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Cross-Over Studies

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review