Prevalence and characteristics of diabetic patients in a chronic heart failure population
Abstract
Background Previously, estimates of the prevalence of diabetes mellitus (DM) in patients with chronic heart failure (CHF) have solely been based on history in retrospective studies. The aim of this study was to investigate the prevalence of DM and glucose abnormalities in patients with CHF in accordance with the modern diagnostic criteria of DM. A second aim was to characterize patients with DM with respect to severity of CHF.Methods and results A prospective study including patients with systolic CHF admitted to a heart failure clinic. Fasting blood glucose (FBG) levels were measured on two occasions, for classification of DM. Severity of CHF was assessed by NYHA class, echocardiography, 6 min walk test and plasma NT-proBNP levels. A total of 195 consecutive patients were included in the study, of these 188 were eligible for classification of DM. A total of 21% had DM by history, 11% of the patients without known DM had FBG> or =6.1 mmol/l, and a diagnosis of DM was confirmed in half of these patients. There were no differences in severity of heart failure between patients with DM by definition and non-DM patients; however, high body mass index was related to worse CHF symptoms.Conclusion Twenty six percent of the patients had DM by definition, 20% of these were undiagnosed at the time of admission. One single measurement of FBG is not sufficient to establish a diagnosis of DM. Diabetes was not related to CHF symptoms or to a degree of left ventricular dysfunction.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Approximately 25% of patients with HF in England and Denmark also had T2DM.
“Approximately 25% of patients with HF in England 25 and Denmark 28 also had T2DM.”
From Type 2 diabetes mellitus and heart failure: A position statement from the Heart Failure Association of the European Society of Cardiology (2018) · cites this paper as [28]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 44 · Cited by 33
- Authors
- Kistorp, C., Galatius, S., Gustafsson, F., Faber, J., Corell, P., & Hildebrandt, P.
- Affiliations
- Frederiksberg Hospital (DK)
- Venue
- International Journal of Cardiology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2005-04
- Volume
- 100
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 281-287
- ISSN
- 0167-5273 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2045817193
- Cited by
- 33
- References
- 44
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 5 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2015: 2 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 1.13
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- International Journal of Cardiology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Research at the University of Copenhagen (University of Copenhagen) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Heart Failure Treatment and Management
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiovascular Function and Risk Factors
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins
- Keywords
- diabetes mellitus, chronic heart failure, prevalence, fasting blood glucose, abnormal glucose metabolism, undiagnosed diabetes, heart failure severity, body mass index, left ventricular dysfunction, NT-proBNP, NYHA functional class
- MeSH terms
- Aged, Analysis of Variance, Blood Glucose, Denmark, Diabetes Mellitus, Female, Heart Failure, Humans, Male, Prospective Studies, Severity of Illness Index, Body Mass Index, Prevalence, Statistics, Nonparametric
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review