Cited by 33Heart Failure Treatment and ManagementCardiovascular Function and Risk FactorsDiabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins

Prevalence and characteristics of diabetic patients in a chronic heart failure population

Kistorp, Caroline, Galatius, Søren, Gustafsson, Finn, Faber, Jens, Corell, Pernille, Hildebrandt, Per·2005·International Journal of Cardiology

Abstract

Background Previously, estimates of the prevalence of diabetes mellitus (DM) in patients with chronic heart failure (CHF) have solely been based on history in retrospective studies. The aim of this study was to investigate the prevalence of DM and glucose abnormalities in patients with CHF in accordance with the modern diagnostic criteria of DM. A second aim was to characterize patients with DM with respect to severity of CHF.Methods and results A prospective study including patients with systolic CHF admitted to a heart failure clinic. Fasting blood glucose (FBG) levels were measured on two occasions, for classification of DM. Severity of CHF was assessed by NYHA class, echocardiography, 6 min walk test and plasma NT-proBNP levels. A total of 195 consecutive patients were included in the study, of these 188 were eligible for classification of DM. A total of 21% had DM by history, 11% of the patients without known DM had FBG> or =6.1 mmol/l, and a diagnosis of DM was confirmed in half of these patients. There were no differences in severity of heart failure between patients with DM by definition and non-DM patients; however, high body mass index was related to worse CHF symptoms.Conclusion Twenty six percent of the patients had DM by definition, 20% of these were undiagnosed at the time of admission. One single measurement of FBG is not sufficient to establish a diagnosis of DM. Diabetes was not related to CHF symptoms or to a degree of left ventricular dysfunction.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ijcard.2004.10.024

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 44 · Cited by 33

Authors
Kistorp, C., Galatius, S., Gustafsson, F., Faber, J., Corell, P., & Hildebrandt, P.
Affiliations
Frederiksberg Hospital (DK)
Venue
International Journal of Cardiology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2005-04
Volume
100
Issue
2
Pages
281-287
ISSN
0167-5273 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2045817193
Cited by
33
References
44
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 5 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2015: 2 · 2012: 1
FWCI
1.13
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • International Journal of Cardiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research at the University of Copenhagen (University of Copenhagen) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Heart Failure Treatment and Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiovascular Function and Risk Factors
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins
Keywords
diabetes mellitus, chronic heart failure, prevalence, fasting blood glucose, abnormal glucose metabolism, undiagnosed diabetes, heart failure severity, body mass index, left ventricular dysfunction, NT-proBNP, NYHA functional class
MeSH terms
Aged, Analysis of Variance, Blood Glucose, Denmark, Diabetes Mellitus, Female, Heart Failure, Humans, Male, Prospective Studies, Severity of Illness Index, Body Mass Index, Prevalence, Statistics, Nonparametric

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review