Obstructive sleep apnea and risk of cardiovascular disease and all-cause mortality: A meta-analysis of prospective cohort studies
Open accessAbstract
Background The association between obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) and the incidence of cardiovascular disease (CVD) has been examined in many studies. However, the findings are not entirely consistent across studies. Our goal was to evaluate the association between OSA and risk of CVD and all-cause mortality by performing a meta-analysis of prospective cohort studies.Methods We used generalized least squares regression models to estimate the dose-response relationship. Heterogeneity, subgroup, and sensitivity analyses and publication bias were performed.Results Twelve prospective cohort studies involving 25,760 participants were included in the meta-analysis. The overall combined relative risks for individuals with severe OSA compared with individuals with an AHI of <5 were 1.79 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.47 to 2.18) for CVD, 1.21 (95% CI: 0.75 to 1.96) for incident fatal and non-fatal coronary heart disease, 2.15 (95% CI: 1.42 to 3.24) for incident fatal and non-fatal stroke, and 1.92 (95% CI: 1.38 to 2.69) for deaths from all-causes. A positive association with CVD was observed for moderate OSA but not for mild OSA. The results of the dose-response relationship indicated that per 10-unit increase in the apnea-hypopnea index was associated with a 17% greater risk of CVD in the general population.Conclusions This meta-analysis of prospective cohort studies suggests that severe OSA significantly increases CVD risk, stroke, and all-cause mortality. A positive association with CVD was observed for moderate OSA but not for mild OSA.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In three of those 12 studies, severe obstructive sleep apnea was associated with increased stroke risk (combined RR 2.15; 95% CI 1.42-3.24).
“Three of the 12 studies examined the relationship between severe OSA and risk of stroke. Patients with severe OSA had an increased risk for stroke (combined RR = 2.15, 95% CI: 1.42, 3.24).”
From International Consensus Statement on Obstructive Sleep Apnea (2023) · cites this paper as [757]
Section 3.4 reports the claimed association and pooled RR of 2.15 (95% CI 1.42–3.24). It says four studies assessed severe OSA and stroke risk, however, not three. (LLM, conf=0.95)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredA meta-analysis of 12 prospective cohort studies with 25,760 participants found severe obstructive sleep apnea independently associated with increased risk of stroke, cardiovascular disease, and all-cause mortality.
“An MA was conducted of 12 prospective cohort studies that followed a total of 25,760 participants for major CV events, fatal and nonfatal stroke, coronary heart disease, and all-cause mortality. It was found that severe OSA is independently associated with an increased risk of stroke, CV disease, and all-cause mortality.”
From International Consensus Statement on Obstructive Sleep Apnea (2023) · cites this paper as [757]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 58 · Cited by 324
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- [15]15. Martínez-García MÁ, Soler-Cataluña JJ, Ejarque-Martínez L, et al. Continuous positive airway pressure treatment reduces mortality in patients with ischemic stroke and obstructive sleep apnea. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2009;180:36-41.
- [31]31. Redline S, Yenokyan G, Gottlieb DJ, et al. Obstructive sleep apnea-hypopnea and in- cident stroke. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2010;182:269-77.
- Authors
- Wang, X., Ouyang, Y., Wang, Z., Zhao, G., Liu, L., & Bi, Y.
- Affiliations
- Shandong University (CN)
- Huazhong University of Science and Technology (CN)
- Corresponding author
- Liu, Liegang
- Venue
- International Journal of Cardiology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2013-11
- Volume
- 169
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 207-214
- ISSN
- 0167-5273 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2027316426
- Semantic Scholar
- a02b4b99cd6e1406628e14c53fec8699f46f1767
- Cited by
- 324
- References
- 58
- Citations by year
- 2026: 16 · 2025: 30 · 2024: 26 · 2023: 27 · 2022: 28 · 2021: 20 · 2020: 29 · 2019: 29 · 2018: 20 · 2017: 34 · 2016: 32 · 2015: 25 · 2014: 8
- FWCI
- 2.39
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- International Journal of Cardiology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Science and Technology Support Program of China (2012BAI02B02)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Obstructive Sleep Apnea Research
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Sleep and related disorders
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Apelin-related biomedical research
- Keywords
- obstructive sleep apnea, cardiovascular disease, all-cause mortality, stroke, coronary artery disease, apnea-hypopnea index, dose-response relationship
- MeSH terms
- Cardiovascular Diseases, Humans, Mortality, Prospective Studies, Risk Factors, Cohort Studies, Sleep Apnea, Obstructive
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review