The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Children (and adults) benefit from visual feedback during gesture interaction on mobile touchscreen devices
Open accessOverview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“It was found that search behavior on mobile device was different from that on desktop.”
From Usability Studies on Mobile User Interface Design Patterns: A Systematic Literature Review (2017) · cites this paper as [50]
In the citing paper
“Most mobile users used mobile devices for directed search, where the objective was to find a predetermined topic of interest with minimum divergence by unrelated links [49,50].”
From Usability Studies on Mobile User Interface Design Patterns: A Systematic Literature Review (2017) · cites this paper as [50]
In the citing paper
“They found that participants of both age groups seemed confused by the absence of feedback, but the results were magnified for children [89].”
From Usability Studies on Mobile User Interface Design Patterns: A Systematic Literature Review (2017) · cites this paper as [89]
In the citing paper
“Anthony et al. 's study [89] was one of a few studies that investigated children users and input on mobile devices.”
From Usability Studies on Mobile User Interface Design Patterns: A Systematic Literature Review (2017) · cites this paper as [89]
In the citing paper
“They found that participants of both age groups seemed confused by the absence of feedback, but the results were magnified for children [89].”
From Usability Studies on Mobile User Interface Design Patterns: A Systematic Literature Review (2017) · cites this paper as [89]
Citations
Cites
Usable gestures for blind people: understanding preference and performance
Kane, S. K., Wobbrock, J. O., & Ladner, R. E. (2011) · Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/1978942.1979001 · Cited by 314 · cited 2×
“, 2010), accessible gestures (Kane et al., 2011), and differences between pen/stylus and finger gesture input (Tu et al.”
Background
Research works printed but not linked: 14
- Zhai, 2012, Foundational issues in touch-surface stroke gesture design—an integrative review, Found. Trends Hum.–Comput. Interact, 5, 97, 10.1561/1100000012 · DOI
- De Bruyn, 2008, Visual feedback is not essential for children to make the perpendicular bias, Percep. ECVP Abstract Supple., 37, 149
- Smyth, 1989, Visual control of movement patterns and the grammar of action, Acta Psychol., 70, 253, 10.1016/0001-6918(89)90025-5 · DOI
- Vinter, 1993, The role of manual dominance and visual feedback in circular drawing movements, J. Hum. Mov. Stud., 25, 11
- Q. Brown, L. Anthony, Toward comparing the touchscreen interaction patterns of kids and adults, in: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Workshop on Educational Software, Interfaces and Technology, 2012, 4 pages.
- Donker, 2007, Aiming and clicking in young children’s use of the computer mouse, Comput. Hum. Behav., 23, 2863, 10.1016/j.chb.2006.06.002 · DOI
- Hourcade, 2004, Differences in pointing task performance between preschool children and adults using mice, ACM Trans. Comput. Hum. Interact., 11, 357, 10.1145/1035575.1035577 · DOI
- Jones, 1991, An empirical study of children’s use of computer pointing devices, J. Educ. Comput. Res., 7, 61, 10.2190/2WBH-V235-YA82-VNMC · DOI
- Q. Brown, L. Hatley, E.M. Bonsignore, A. Druin, Mobile natives: Unlocking the potential of educational technology, in: ACM SIGCHI 2nd Workshop on UI Technologies and their Impact on Educational Pedagogy, 2011, 4 pages.
- Inkpen, 2001, Drag-and-drop versus point-and-click mouse interaction styles for children, ACM ToCHI, 8, 1, 10.1145/371127.371146 · DOI
- Joiner, 1998, It is best to point for young children: a comparison of children’s pointing and dragging, Comput. Hum. Behav., 14, 513, 10.1016/S0747-5632(98)00021-1 · DOI
- Akamatsu, 1995, A comparison of tactile, auditory, and visual feedback in a pointing task using a mouse-type device, Ergonomics, 38, 816, 10.1080/00140139508925152 · DOI
- Anthony, 2014, Designing smarter touch-based interfaces for educational contexts, J. Pers. Ubiquitous Comput., 18, 1471, 10.1007/s00779-013-0749-9 · DOI
- Rubine, 1991, Specifying gestures by example, SIGGRAPH Comput. Graph., 25, 329, 10.1145/127719.122753 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Usability Studies on Mobile User Interface Design Patterns: A Systematic Literature Review
Punchoojit, L., & Hongwarittorrn, N. (2017) · Advances in Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1155/2017/6787504 · Cited by 235
Metadata
- Authors
- Anthony, L., Brown, Q., Nias, J., & Tate, B.
- Affiliations
- University of Florida (US)
- Bowie State University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Anthony, Lisa
- Venue
- International Journal of Child-Computer Interaction
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2015-12
- Volume
- 6
- Pages
- 17-27
- ISSN
- 2212-8689 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2272646682
- Cited by
- 14
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 1
- FWCI
- 4.10
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Update notices
- erratum (2024-09-01)
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- International Journal of Child-Computer Interaction (acceptedVersion)
- Funders
- Department of Education HBGI (#P031B090207-11)
- National Science Foundation (#IIS-1218395/IIS-1433228 and IIS-1218664)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Interactive and Immersive Displays
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Hand Gesture Recognition Systems
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Usability and User Interface Design
- Keywords
- visual feedback, gesture-based interaction, children, age differences, gesture recognition, gesture design, usability
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
