Long-term, low-level adolescent nicotine exposure produces dose-dependent changes in cocaine sensitivity and reward in adult mice
Abstract
Cigarette smoking by adolescents is a strong predictor of future drug use, abuse, and dependence. While this "gateway drug effect" is assumed to be related to psychosocial factors, data from our laboratory suggests that adolescent nicotine use may permanently disrupt reward systems through changes in dopamine receptor function. Behavioral pharmacological methods known to be indirectly (motor activity) and directly (conditioned-place-preference) related to drug reinforcement were used to examine changes in cocaine sensitivity. Testing was performed on adult mice that were exposed to nicotine (0.3, 1.0, and 3.0 mg/kg, SC, M-F, b.i.d.) or saline during adolescence (postnatal days 25-57). Prior to testing, subjects had a 28 day drug-free, time-off period. After acclimation to the testing apparatus, the locomotor effects (30 min, 30 cm traveled) of cocaine (5, 10, and 20 mg/kg, IP) were measured daily; cocaine tests were preceded and followed by saline control tests. Following the acute dose-response curve, mice received saline followed by 5 days of 20.0 mg/kg cocaine. Thereafter, mice underwent condition-place-preference testing. A pre-test was performed to determine compartment preference (i.e., no injection, 20 min test). Cocaine (10 mg/kg, IP) was paired with the subjects non-preferred side and saline with the other. Conditioning sessions were conducted for 8 days with the order of drug/saline injections counter-balanced across subjects. A drug-free, post-test occurred on the…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Nicotine treatment during early adolescence increases later cocaine-induced locomotor sensitization.
“Nicotine treatment during early adolescence also increases subsequent cocaine-induced locomotor sensitization”
From Unique, long-term effects of nicotine on adolescent brain. (2020) · cites this paper as Kelley & Rowan, 2004
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 59 · Cited by 59
- Authors
- Kelley, B. M., & Rowan, J. D.
- Affiliations
- Bridgewater College (US)
- Corresponding author
- Kelley, Brian M.
- ORCID
- Kelley, Brian M.
- Venue
- International Journal of Developmental Neuroscience
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2004-07-02
- Volume
- 22
- Issue
- 5-6
- Pages
- 339-348
- ISSN
- 0736-5748 (ISSN-L)
- 1873-474X
- OpenAlex
- W2091380181
- Cited by
- 59
- References
- 59
- Citations by year
- 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 4 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 2
- FWCI
- 1.17
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- International Journal of Developmental Neuroscience (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Thomas F. and Kate Miller Jeffress Memorial Trust
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Smoking Behavior and Cessation
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptors Study
- Keywords
- adolescent nicotine exposure, cocaine sensitivity, cocaine reward, dopamine receptors, dopamine D1 receptor, dopamine D2 receptor, dopamine D3 receptor, nicotine dose-response, conditioned place preference, locomotor activity, adolescent smoking, developmental neurotoxicity
- MeSH terms
- Adaptation, Physiological, Aging, Animals, Animals, Newborn, Body Weight, Cocaine, Dose-Response Relationship, Drug, Drug Interactions, Female, Injections, Intraperitoneal, Injections, Subcutaneous, Locomotion, Mice, Inbred C57BL, Nicotine, Receptors, Dopamine, Reward, Sex Factors, Mice
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review