Cigarette smoke exposure during adolescence but not adulthood induces anxiety‐like behavior and locomotor stimulation in rats during withdrawal
Abstract
Adolescence is a critical period for cigarette smoking. Studies have shown that adolescent smokers are more likely to become addicted, are less likely to quit, and are more prone to relapse. In the present study, we examined the affective symptoms experienced by adolescents during withdrawal from cigarette smoke exposure. Towards this goal, adolescent male rats were repeatedly exposed to cigarette smoke, through an automated smoking machine, for 14 days. Then, cigarette smoke exposure was discontinued to induce spontaneous withdrawal. During the withdrawal period, anxiety-like behavior (elevated plus-maze test), locomotor activity (open-field test), and learning and memory (passive-avoidance test) were evaluated. These behavioral evaluations were conducted during the first, third, seventh, and fourteenth day of withdrawal. For comparison, parallel experiments were performed in adult rats. We found that adolescent rats exposed to cigarette smoke experiences increased anxiety-like behavior and locomotor activity during withdrawal relative to control rats. Learning and memory processes were undisturbed. On the other hand, adult rats exposed to cigarette smoke did not show any statistically significant behavioral alteration during withdrawal. These results are consistent with the notion that adolescents are differentially sensitive to the withdrawal effects of cigarette smoking. This sensitivity might be a factor why adolescent smokers have difficulty quitting and are more prone to relapse.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
ANE has been implicated in development of anxiety- and depression-like symptoms.
“ANE has also been implicated in the development of anxiety- and depression-like symptoms [172, 196–198].”
From Consequences of adolescent drug use (2023) · cites this paper as [197]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 42 · Cited by 19
- Authors
- de la Peña, J. B., Ahsan, H. M., Botanas, C. J., dela Peña, I. J., Woo, T., Kim, H. J., & Cheong, J. H.
- Affiliations
- Uimyung Research Institute for Neuroscience, Sahmyook University 815 Hwarang‐ro Nowon‐gu Seoul 139‐742 South Korea
- University of Central Punjab (PK)
- Sahmyook University (KR)
- Corresponding author
- Cheong, Jae Hoon
- Venue
- International Journal of Developmental Neuroscience
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2016-09-16
- Volume
- 55
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 49-55
- ISSN
- 0736-5748 (ISSN-L)
- 1873-474X
- OpenAlex
- W2518757534
- Cited by
- 19
- References
- 42
- Citations by year
- 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 5 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1
- FWCI
- 1.07
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- International Journal of Developmental Neuroscience (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF‐2016R1D1A1B02010387, NRF‐2016K2A9A1A09914265)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Smoking Behavior and Cessation
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Prenatal Substance Exposure Effects
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptors Study
- Keywords
- cigarette smoke exposure, adolescent smoking, nicotine withdrawal, anxiety-like behavior, locomotor activity, learning and memory, tobacco dependence, relapse
- MeSH terms
- Aging, Analysis of Variance, Animals, Animals, Newborn, Anxiety, Avoidance Learning, Disease Models, Animal, Exploratory Behavior, Male, Nicotine, Tobacco Use Disorder, Rats, Sprague-Dawley, Nicotinic Agonists, Maze Learning, Rats
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review