Cited by 54Attention Deficit Hyperactivity DisorderPrenatal Substance Exposure EffectsNeurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior

A prenatal nicotine exposure mouse model of methylphenidate responsive ADHD‐associated cognitive phenotypes

Zhu, Jinmin, Fan, Fangfang, McCarthy, Deirdre M., Zhang, Lin, Cannon, Elisa N., Spencer, Thomas J., Biederman, Joseph, Bhide, Pradeep G.·2017·International Journal of Developmental Neuroscience

Abstract

Prenatal exposure to nicotine via cigarette smoke or other forms of tobacco use is a significant environmental risk factor for attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). The neurobiological mechanisms underlying the link between prenatal nicotine exposure (PNE) and ADHD are not well understood. Animal models, especially rodent models, are beginning to bridge this gap in knowledge. Although ADHD is characterized by hyperactivity, inattention, impulsivity and working memory deficits, the majority of the animal models are based on only one or two ADHD associated phenotypes, in particular, hyperactivity or inattention. We report a PNE mouse model that displays the full range of ADHD associated behavioral phenotypes including working memory deficit, attention deficit and impulsive‐like behavior. All of the ADHD‐associated phenotypes respond to a single administration of a therapeutic equivalent dose of methylphenidate. In an earlier study, we showed that PNE produces hyperactivity, frontal cortical hypodopaminergic state and thinning of the cingulate cortex. Collectively, these data suggest that the PNE mouse model recapitulates key features of ADHD and may be a suitable preclinical model for ADHD research.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ijdevneu.2017.01.014

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 77 · Cited by 54

Authors
Zhu, J., Fan, F., McCarthy, D. M., Zhang, L., Cannon, E. N., Spencer, T. J., Biederman, J., & Bhide, P. G.
Affiliations
  • Florida State University (US)
  • Harvard University (US)
Corresponding author
Bhide, Pradeep G.
Venue
International Journal of Developmental Neuroscience
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2017-02-04
Volume
58
Issue
1
Pages
26-34
ISSN
  • 0736-5748 (ISSN-L)
  • 1873-474X
OpenAlex
W2585893684
Cited by
54
References
77
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 1
FWCI
4.94
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • International Journal of Developmental Neuroscience (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Jim and Betty Anne Rodgers Chair Funds
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Prenatal Substance Exposure Effects
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
Keywords
prenatal nicotine exposure, attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, methylphenidate, working memory deficits, attention deficits, hyperactivity, cingulate cortex, mouse model, tobacco use, animal model of ADHD
MeSH terms
Age Factors, Central Nervous System Stimulants, Analysis of Variance, Animals, Animals, Newborn, Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity, Cognition Disorders, Drinking, Escape Reaction, Female, Litter Size, Male, Methylphenidate, Mice, Inbred C57BL, Nicotine, Pregnancy, Prenatal Exposure Delayed Effects, Sex Factors, Nicotinic Agonists, Maze Learning, Recognition, Psychology, Mice

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review