Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 168

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

What is the value of health emergency preparedness exercises? A scoping review study

Open access
Skryabina, Elena, Reedy, Gabriel, Amlôt, Richard, Jaye, Peter, Riley, Paul·2017·International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction

Abstract

Emergency exercises involving the health community are considered an important and integral part of emergency preparedness activities. However, little is known about whether these exercises are effective at improving individual and/or organisational preparedness for responding to emergencies. This paper reviews and summarises published evidence on the effectiveness and benefits of exercises to prepare health emergency professionals for responding to emergencies and disasters. A literature search strategy was designed to identify the relevant publications from four major medical databases (Medline, Embase, Global Health and CINAHL). Studies meeting our inclusion criteria were analysed in detail (N=86). Both qualitative and quantitative data were reviewed. Data analysis involved a descriptive summary and a thematic analysis. Health emergency preparedness exercises were found to be effective (post exercise) at improving participants’ knowledge of emergency activities, policies and procedures and improving overall competence and confidence. Other immediate individual benefits included improved perceptions of preparedness and improved understanding of individual roles and roles of partners. Whether these improvements persist over time and translate into improved emergency response is not clear. The most commonly reported post-exercise organisational benefits were: identifying gaps or limitations in plans, protocols or procedures and providing opportunities to share lessons. Only a few identified studies reported the long-term impact of exercises on job practices and on real emergency response. Published evidence of exercises impact on individual and organisational levels of emergency preparedness and response over the long term is very limited. The majority of the studies included (n=65, 76%) were US-based.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2016.12.010

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 3 references

Metadata

Authors
Skryabina, E., Reedy, G., Amlôt, R., Jaye, P., & Riley, P.
Venue
International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2017-03
Volume
21
Pages
274-283
ISSN
2212-4209 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2564347032
Cited by
168
References
3
FWCI
9.29
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
hybrid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: What is the value of health emergency preparedness exercises? A scoping review study. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2016.12.010
The paper
Skryabina, E., Reedy, G., Amlôt, R., Jaye, P., & Riley, P. (2017). What is the value of health emergency preparedness exercises? A scoping review study. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2016.12.010

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.