CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 349Disaster Management and ResilienceInfrastructure Resilience and Vulnerability AnalysisEarthquake and Disaster Impact Studies

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 47 of the 48 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Vulnerability and vulnerable groups from an intersectionality perspective

Open access
Kuran, Christian Henrik Alexander, Morsut, Claudia, Kruke, Bjørn Ivar, Krüger, Marco, Segnestam, Lisa, Orru, Kati, Nævestad, Tor Olav, Airola, Merja, Keränen, Jaana, Gabel, Friedrich, Hansson, Sten, Torpan, Sten·2020·International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction
DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2020.101826
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

In general, the identification and protection of vulnerable groups in the case of hazards or when a crisis unfolds is an issue that any crisis and disaster risk management should address, since people have different levels of exposure to hazards and crises. In this article, we promote the application of the intersectionality perspective in the study of vulnerable groups, and we call for intersectionality as a guiding principle in risk and crisis management, to provide a better and more nuanced picture of vulnerabilities and vulnerable groups. This can help national and local authorities and agencies to formulate specific guides, to hire staff with the skills necessary to meet particular needs, and to inform vulnerable groups in a particular way, taking into account the differences that may coexist within the same group. Intersectionality allows us to read vulnerability not as the characteristic of some socio-demographic groups. It is rather the result of different and interdependent societal stratification processes that result in multiple dimensions of marginalisation. In this vein, we argue that research should focus on 1) self-perceived vulnerability of individuals and an intersectionality approach to unpack vulnerable groups; 2) cases of crises according to the level and/or likelihood of individual exposure to hazards, to better nuance issues of vulnerability.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2020.101826

Cites

47 of 47 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 48 references

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Crenshaw, 1989, vol. 1989, 139

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 301–349 of 349

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Kuran, C. H. A., Morsut, C., Kruke, B. I., Krüger, M., Segnestam, L., Orru, K., Nævestad, T. O., Airola, M., Keränen, J., Gabel, F., Hansson, S., & Torpan, S.
Affiliations
  • University of Stavanger (NO)
  • University of Tübingen (DE)
  • Stockholm Environment Institute (SE)
  • University of Tartu (EE)
  • Institute of Transport Economics (NO)
  • VTT Technical Research Centre of Finland (FI)
Corresponding author
Kuran, Christian Henrik Alexander
ORCID
Venue
International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-11
Volume
50
Pages
101826
ISSN
2212-4209 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1016/j.ijdrr.2020.101826
OpenAlex
W3092343157
Cited by
349
References
48
Citations by year
2026: 63 · 2025: 85 · 2024: 79 · 2023: 67 · 2022: 35 · 2021: 19 · 2020: 1
FWCI
40.80
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
Locations
  • International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • NORA - Norwegian Open Research Archives (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
Horizon2020 project BuildERS (833496)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Disaster Management and Resilience
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Civil and Structural Engineering › Infrastructure Resilience and Vulnerability Analysis
  • Social Sciences › Geography, Planning and Development › Earthquake and Disaster Impact Studies
Keywords
intersectionality, vulnerable populations, vulnerability, crisis management, disaster risk management, marginalization, hazard exposure, risk management

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review