CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 26

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Sentiment-topic dynamic collaborative analysis-based public opinion mapping in aviation disaster management: A case study of the MU5735 air crash

Dai, Jingqi, Zhao, Ye, Li, Zongmin·2024·International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction
DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2024.104268
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2024.104268

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 55

  1. Xiang, 2019, Study on the application of government affairs micro-blog in the disclosure of government emergency information in China, Disaster Prev. Manag.: Int. J., 28, 661, 10.1108/DPM-09-2018-0319 · DOI
  2. Li, 2022, Using data mining technology to analyse the spatiotemporal public opinion of covid-19 vaccine on social media, Electron. Libr., 40, 10.1108/EL-03-2022-0062 · DOI
  3. Wang, 2022, Factors influencing fake news rebuttal acceptance during the covid-19 pandemic and the moderating effect of cognitive ability, Comput. Hum. Behav., 130, 10.1016/j.chb.2021.107174 · DOI
  4. Hwong, 2017, What makes you tick? The psychology of social media engagement in space science communication, Comput. Hum. Behav., 68, 480, 10.1016/j.chb.2016.11.068 · DOI
  5. Wang, 2022, Research on the public opinion guidance mechanism of major public health incidents, Front. Psychol., 13
  6. Moorthy, 2018, Disaster communication in managing vulnerabilities, J. Commun., 34, 51
  7. Luna, 2018, Social media applications and emergency management: A literature review and research agenda, Int. J. Disaster Risk Reduct., 28, 565, 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2018.01.006 · DOI
  8. Alexander, 2014, Social media in disaster risk reduction and crisis management, Sci. Eng. Ethics, 20, 717, 10.1007/s11948-013-9502-z · DOI
  9. Wu, 2021, Extracting disaster information based on sina weibo in China: A case study of the 2019 typhoon lekima, Int. J. Disaster Risk Reduct., 60, 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2021.102304 · DOI
  10. Ragini, 2018, Big data analytics for disaster response and recovery through sentiment analysis, Int. J. Inf. Manage., 42, 13
  11. Han, 2019, Using social media to mine and analyze public sentiment during a disaster: A case study of the 2018 shouguang city flood in China, ISPRS Int. J. Geo-Inf., 8
  12. Behl, 2021, Twitter for disaster relief through sentiment analysis for covid-19 and natural hazard crises, Int. J. Disaster Risk Reduct., 55, 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2021.102101 · DOI
  13. H.F. Delia, O.M. Rosa, M. Manuel, M.y. Gómez, Exploring the use of psycholinguistic information in author profiling, in: Pattern Recognition: 11th Mexican Conference, MCPR 2019, Querétaro, Mexico, June 26–29, 2019, Proceedings 11, 2019, pp. 411–421. · DOI
  14. Vashishtha, 2021, Highlighting keyphrases using senti-scoring and fuzzy entropy for unsupervised sentiment analysis, Expert Syst. Appl., 169, 10.1016/j.eswa.2020.114323 · DOI
  15. Mehmood, 2020, An enhanced lexicon-based approach for sentiment analysis: a case study on illegal immigration, Online Inf. Rev., 44, 1097, 10.1108/OIR-10-2018-0295 · DOI
  16. Sanglerdsinlapachai, 2021, Improving sentiment analysis on clinical narratives by exploiting umls semantic types, Artif. Intell. Med., 113, 10.1016/j.artmed.2021.102033 · DOI
  17. Wang, 2016, Microblog text semantic retrieval based on hownet, Inform. Sci., 34, 134
  18. Cui, 2019, Time series-oriented study on the sentiment analysis of the derived public opinion for microblog emergencies, Inform. Sci., 37, 119
  19. Jia, 2020, Emotional characteristics and time series analysis of internet public opinion participants based on emotional feature words, Int. J. Adv. Robot. Syst., 17, 105, 10.1177/1729881420904213 · DOI
  20. Liu, 2015, A multi-label classification based approach for sentiment classification, Expert Syst. Appl., 42, 1083, 10.1016/j.eswa.2014.08.036 · DOI
  21. Zhang, 2021, Conciseness is better: Recurrent attention lstm model for document-level sentiment analysis, Neurocomputing, 462, 101, 10.1016/j.neucom.2021.07.072 · DOI
  22. Arbane, 2023, Social media-based covid-19 sentiment classification model using Bi-LSTM, Expert Syst. Appl., 212, 10.1016/j.eswa.2022.118710 · DOI
  23. Jia, 2022, Sentiment classification of microblog: A framework based on bert and cnn with attention mechanism, Comput. Electr. Eng., 101, 10.1016/j.compeleceng.2022.108032 · DOI
  24. Fitri, 2019, Sentiment analysis of social media twitter with case of anti-lgbt campaign in indonesia using naïve bayes, decision tree, and random forest algorithm, Procedia Comput. Sci., 161, 765, 10.1016/j.procs.2019.11.181 · DOI
  25. Zhao, 2021, Social emotion classification of Japanese text information based on svm and knn, J. Ambient Intell. Humaniz. Comput., 8, 1
  26. Kapočiūtė-Dzikienė, 2019, Sentiment analysis of lithuanian texts using traditional and deep learning approaches, Computers, 8, 1, 10.3390/computers8010004 · DOI
  27. Chen, 2022, Mining and evolution analysis of network public opinion concerns of stakeholders in hot social events, Mathematics, 10, 1
  28. Wang, 2021, Online rumor propagation of social media on nimby conflict: Temporal patterns, frameworks and rumor-mongers, Environ. Impact Assess. Rev., 91, 10.1016/j.eiar.2021.106647 · DOI
  29. Li, 2022, Lifecycle research of social media rumor refutation effectiveness based on machine learning and visualization technology, Inf. Process. Manage., 59, 10.1016/j.ipm.2022.103077 · DOI
  30. Lv, 2022, New insights into the social rumor characteristics during the covid-19 pandemic in China, Front. Public Health, 10, 1, 10.3389/fpubh.2022.864955 · DOI
  31. Yan, 2022, The evolution and governance of online rumors during the public health emergency: taking covid-19 pandemic related rumors as an example, Int. J. Manag. Sci. Eng. Manag., 17, 1
  32. Zeng, 2014, Comparative study on transmission phase and model of internet public opinion, J. Intell., 33, 119
  33. Fang, 2022, Analysis of public information demand during the covid-19 pandemic based on four-stage crisis model, Front. Phys.
  34. Tang, 2011, Quantitative study of individual emotional states in social networks, IEEE Trans. Affect. Comput., 3, 132, 10.1109/T-AFFC.2011.23 · DOI
  35. Mitrović, 2010, Networks and emotion-driven user communities at popular blogs, Eur. Phys. J. B, 77, 597, 10.1140/epjb/e2010-00279-x · DOI
  36. Pino, 2020, Mapping the network of social cognition domains in children with autism spectrum disorder through graph analysis, Front. Psychiatry, 11, 10.3389/fpsyt.2020.579339 · DOI
  37. Saroj, 2020, Use of social media in crisis management: A survey, Int. J. Disaster Risk Reduct., 48, 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2020.101584 · DOI
  38. Trejo-Rangel, 2023, Incorporating social innovations in the elaboration of disaster risk mitigation policies, Int. J. Disaster Risk Reduct., 84, 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2022.103450 · DOI
  39. Yan, 2022, Emotion-enhanced classification based on fuzzy reasoning, Int. J. Mach. Learn. Cybern., 13, 839, 10.1007/s13042-021-01356-y · DOI
  40. Blei, 2003, Latent dirichlet allocation, J. Mach. Learn. Res., 3, 993
  41. Tazibt, 2019, Latent dirichlet allocation-based temporal summarization, Int. J. Web Inf. Syst., 15, 83
  42. C. Sievert, K. Shirley, Ldavis: A method for visualizing and interpreting topics, in: Proceedings of the Workshop on Interactive Language Learning, Visualization, and Interfaces, 2014, pp. 63–70. · DOI
  43. Hogan, 2021, Knowledge graphs, ACM Comput. Surv., 54, 1, 10.1145/3447772 · DOI
  44. Jia, 2022, International public opinion analysis of four olympic games: From 2008 to 2022, J. Saf. Sci. Resil., 3, 252
  45. Ahn, 2015, Development of cyber-attack scenarios for nuclear power plants using scenario graphs, Int. J. Distrib. Sens. Netw., 11, 10.1155/2015/836258 · DOI
  46. Sun, 2019, Forecasting tourist arrivals with machine learning and internet search index, Tour. Manag., 70, 1, 10.1016/j.tourman.2018.07.010 · DOI
  47. Yang, 2015, Forecasting chinese tourist volume with search engine data, Tour. Manag., 46, 386, 10.1016/j.tourman.2014.07.019 · DOI
  48. H. Kobayashi, Perplexity on reduced corpora, in: Proceedings of the 52nd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers), 2014, pp. 797–806. · DOI
  49. Bao, 2014, Simultaneously discovering and quantifying risk types from textual risk disclosures, Manage. Sci., 60, 1371, 10.1287/mnsc.2014.1930 · DOI
  50. A. Fang, C. Macdonald, I. Ounis, P. Habel, Examining the coherence of the top ranked tweet topics, in: Proceedings of the 39th International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, 2016, pp. 825–828. · DOI
  51. Wang, 2019, Optimization of topic recognition model for news texts based on lda, J. Digit. Inf. Manag., 17
  52. Peng, 2016, Research on the method of determining the optimal topic number of lda topic model in scientific and technological information analysis, Mod. Libr. Inf. Technol., 32, 42
  53. Griffiths, 2004, Finding scientific topics, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci., 101, 5228, 10.1073/pnas.0307752101 · DOI · Paper page
  54. Gong, 2019, Research on evaluation method of lda topic model in mail classification, 10.1088/1742-6596/1302/3/032001 · DOI
  55. Y. Qu, C. Huang, P. Zhang, J. Zhang, Microblogging after a major disaster in China: a case study of the 2010 yushu earthquake, in: Proceedings of the ACM 2011 Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 2011, pp. 25–34. · DOI

Metadata

Authors
Dai, J., Zhao, Y., & Li, Z.
Venue
International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2024-02
Volume
102
Pages
104268
ISSN
2212-4209
DOI
10.1016/j.ijdrr.2024.104268
Cited by
26
References
1
Language
en
Licence
Funders
  • Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (J2022-049, ZHMH2022-013)
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (72174134)
  • National Office for Philosophy and Social Sciences (22&ZD142)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review