Examining the impact of self-assessment with the use of rubrics on primary school students’ performance
Open accessAbstract
With this trial we examine student self-assessment with rubrics as a means to improve primary school students’ performance. The research sample was 70 fifth and sixth grade students, 39 of whom were in the experimental groups and 31 in the control groups. The students of the experimental groups applied self-assessment with rubrics for a period of two and a half months in Language, History and Writing subjects. All students were assessed with a knowledge test before and after the intervention to compare their scores. The results showed that students’ self- assessment has a positive effect on students’ school performance, especially in Writing. This study emphasizes the importance of ongoing research in this area as well as the need for teacher training.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The quality of students and learning performance are highly correlated.
“Results showed that the quality of students and learning performance are highly correlated.”
From Artificial Intelligence for Assessment and Feedback to Enhance Student Success in Higher Education (2022) · cites this paper as [121]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 64 · Cited by 31
Research works printed but not linked: 3
- Honsa, S., Jr. (2013). Self-assessment in EFL Writing: A study of intermediate EFL students at a Thai University. Voices in Asia Journal, 1 (1), 34-57 .
- Rolheiser, C. , & Ross, J. A. (2000). Student self-evaluation -What do we know? Orbit (Amsterdam, Netherlands), 30 (4), 33-36 .
- Ross, J. A. , Rolheiser, C. , & Hogaboam-Gray, A. (1999). Effects of selfevaluation training on narrative writing. Assessing Writing, 6 (1), 107-132 .
- Authors
- Vasileiadou, D., & Karadimitriou, K.
- Affiliations
- Democritus University of Thrace (GR)
- Corresponding author
- Vasileiadou, Despina
- Venue
- International Journal of Educational Research Open
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2021
- Volume
- 2
- Pages
- 100031
- ISSN
- 2666-3740 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3123853579
- Cited by
- 31
- References
- 64
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 1 · 2019: 1
- FWCI
- 10.98
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- International Journal of Educational Research Open (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Funders
- Hellenic Foundation for Research and Innovation
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Education › Student Assessment and Feedback
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods
- Social Sciences › Education › Educational Assessment and Pedagogy
- Keywords
- self-assessment, rubrics, elementary school students, academic performance, writing skills, language learning, history education, teacher professional development
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
