Solar PV stochastic hosting capacity in distribution networks considering aleatory and epistemic uncertainties
Open accessAbstract
This paper proposes a stochastic method, ''mixed aleatory-epistemic“, for estimating solar PV hosting capacity (HC) of low-voltage (LV) distribution networks. The approach treats the aleatory and epistemic uncertainties in a different way. The HC is estimated by applying the transfer impedance matrix, 'which is only calculated once', and the superposition principle to determine the voltage magnitude rise due to solar PV. By distinguishing between aleatory and epistemic uncertainties, the calculations are limited to the relevant hours (time-of-day or time-of-year) during which high solar PV production is expected. In this way, the random aleatory uncertainties (background voltage, solar PV production, local consumption) are modelled by their probability distributions during the selected time period. The distributions for the epistemic uncertainties (installed capacity per customer, number of customers with solar PV, phase to which single-phase units are connected) are created with simple models involving the interval value and possible occurrence. The stochastic approach proposed is applied to three LV distribution networks to illustrate the method. The results show that both types of uncertainties affect the HC. The need for distribution network planners to identify and distinguish between the types of uncertainties is emphasised.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The authors in [99] proposed a mixed aleatory-epistemic method of stochastic HC estimation that includes the two types of uncertainties but considers them distinctively.
“However, the authors in [99] proposed a mixed aleatory-epistemic method of stochastic HC estimation approach that includes the two types of uncertainties but considers them distinctively.”
From Methods and Tools for PV and EV Hosting Capacity Determination in Low Voltage Distribution Networks—A Review (2023) · cites this paper as [99]
Cites
Bollen, M., & Rönnberg, S. (2017) · Energies · doi:10.3390/en10091325 · Cited by 169 · see citing works
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Umoh, V., Davidson, I., Adebiyi, A., & Ekpe, U. (2023) · Energies · doi:10.3390/en16083609 · Cited by 71 · see citing works
- Authors
- Mulenga, E., Bollen, M. H. J., & Etherden, N.
- Affiliations
- Luleå University of Technology (SE)
- Corresponding author
- Mulenga, Enock
- Venue
- International Journal of Electrical Power & Energy Systems
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2021-09
- Volume
- 130
- Pages
- 106928
- ISSN
- 0142-0615 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3139217462
- Cited by
- 67
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 9 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 20 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 4
- FWCI
- 3.46
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- International Journal of Electrical Power & Energy Systems (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- Diva portal (Dalarna University Library) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Epubl LTU (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Funders
- Swedish Energy Agency
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Optimal Power Flow Distribution
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Electric Power System Optimization
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality › Power System Reliability and Maintenance
- Keywords
- low-voltage distribution networks, aleatoric uncertainty, epistemic uncertainty, superposition, distribution network planning
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review