Cited by 67Optimal Power Flow DistributionElectric Power System OptimizationPower System Reliability and Maintenance

Solar PV stochastic hosting capacity in distribution networks considering aleatory and epistemic uncertainties

Open access
Mulenga, Enock, Bollen, Math H.J., Etherden, Nicholas·2021·International Journal of Electrical Power & Energy Systems

Abstract

This paper proposes a stochastic method, ''mixed aleatory-epistemic“, for estimating solar PV hosting capacity (HC) of low-voltage (LV) distribution networks. The approach treats the aleatory and epistemic uncertainties in a different way. The HC is estimated by applying the transfer impedance matrix, 'which is only calculated once', and the superposition principle to determine the voltage magnitude rise due to solar PV. By distinguishing between aleatory and epistemic uncertainties, the calculations are limited to the relevant hours (time-of-day or time-of-year) during which high solar PV production is expected. In this way, the random aleatory uncertainties (background voltage, solar PV production, local consumption) are modelled by their probability distributions during the selected time period. The distributions for the epistemic uncertainties (installed capacity per customer, number of customers with solar PV, phase to which single-phase units are connected) are created with simple models involving the interval value and possible occurrence. The stochastic approach proposed is applied to three LV distribution networks to illustrate the method. The results show that both types of uncertainties affect the HC. The need for distribution network planners to identify and distinguish between the types of uncertainties is emphasised.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ijepes.2021.106928

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The authors in [99] proposed a mixed aleatory-epistemic method of stochastic HC estimation that includes the two types of uncertainties but considers them distinctively.

    “However, the authors in [99] proposed a mixed aleatory-epistemic method of stochastic HC estimation approach that includes the two types of uncertainties but considers them distinctively.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Mulenga, E., Bollen, M. H. J., & Etherden, N.
Affiliations
Luleå University of Technology (SE)
Corresponding author
Mulenga, Enock
Venue
International Journal of Electrical Power & Energy Systems
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2021-09
Volume
130
Pages
106928
ISSN
0142-0615 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3139217462
Cited by
67
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 20 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 4
FWCI
3.46
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • International Journal of Electrical Power & Energy Systems (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Diva portal (Dalarna University Library) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Epubl LTU (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
Swedish Energy Agency
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Optimal Power Flow Distribution
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Electric Power System Optimization
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality › Power System Reliability and Maintenance
Keywords
low-voltage distribution networks, aleatoric uncertainty, epistemic uncertainty, superposition, distribution network planning

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review