The DOI matches its Crossref record; 19 of the 19 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Post-harvest control strategies: Minimizing mycotoxins in the food chain
Abstract
Contamination of cereal commodities by moulds and mycotoxins results in dry matter, quality, and nutritional losses and represents a significant hazard to the food chain. Most grain is harvested, dried and then stored on farm or in silos for medium/long term storage. Cereal quality is influenced by a range of interacting abiotic and biotic factors. In the so-called stored grain ecosystem, factors include grain and contaminant mould respiration, insect pests, rodents and the key environmental factors of temperature, water availability and intergranular gas composition, and preservatives which are added to conserve moist grain for animal feed. Thus knowledge of the key critical control points during harvesting, drying and storage stages in the cereal production chain are essential in developing effective prevention strategies post-harvest. Studies show that very small amounts of dry matter loss due to mould activity can be tolerated. With <0.5% dry matter loss visible moulding, mycotoxin contamination and downgrading of lots can occur. The key mycotoxigenic moulds in partially dried grain are Penicillium verrucosum (ochratoxin) in damp cool climates of Northern Europe, and Aspergillus flavus (aflatoxins), A. ochraceus (ochratoxin) and some Fusarium species (fumonisins, trichothecenes) on temperate and tropical cereals. Studies on the ecology of these species has resulted in modelling of germination, growth and mycotoxin minima and prediction of fungal contamination levels which may lead to mycotoxin contamination above the tolerable legislative limits (e.g. for ochratoxin). The effect of modified atmospheres and fumigation with sulphur dioxide and ammonia have been attempted to try and control mould spoilage in storage. Elevated CO2 of >75% are required to ensure that growth of mycotoxigenic moulds does not occur in partially dried grain. Sometimes, preservatives based on aliphatic acids have been used to prevent spoilage and mycotoxin contamination of stored commodities, especially feed. These are predominantly fungistats and attempts have been made to use alternatives such as essential oils and anti-oxidants to prevent growth and mycotoxin accumulation in partially dried grain. Interactions between spoilage and mycotoxigenic fungi and insect pests inevitably occurs in stored grain ecosystems and this can further influence contamination with mycotoxins. Effective post-harvest management of stored commodities requires clear monitoring criteria and effective implementation in relation to abiotic and biotic factors, hygiene and monitoring to ensure that mycotoxin contamination is minimised and that stored grain can proceed through the food chain for processing.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Fusarium Mycotoxins: Chemistry, Genetics, And Biology
Desjardins, A. E. (2006) · Cited by 883
Post-harvest fungal ecology: Impact of fungal growth and mycotoxin accumulation in stored grain
Magan, N., Hope, R., Cairns, V., & Aldred, D. (2003) · Epidemiology of Mycotoxin Producing Fungi · doi:10.1007/978-94-017-1452-5_7 · Cited by 326
Self-citationPost-Harvest Fungal Ecology: Impact of Fungal Growth and Mycotoxin Accumulation in Stored Grain
Magan, N., Hope, R., Cairns, V., & Aldred, D. (2003) · European Journal of Plant Pathology · doi:10.1023/a:1026082425177 · Cited by 274
Self-citationRees, D. (1996) · Postharvest Biology and Technology · doi:10.1016/s0925-5214(96)90017-4 · Cited by 270
FUNGAL AND ACTINOMYCETE SPORES AS POLLUTANTS OF THE WORKPLACE AND OCCUPATIONAL ALLERGENS *
(1988) · The Annals of Occupational Hygiene · doi:10.1093/annhyg/32.4.515 · Cited by 248
Penicillium verrucosum in wheat and barley indicates presence of ochratoxin A
Lund, F., & Frisvad, J. C. (2003) · Journal of Applied Microbiology · doi:10.1046/j.1365-2672.2003.02076.x · Cited by 206
Jayas, D. S., White, N. D. G., & William Ernest, M. U. I. R. (1995) · Cited by 205
Food mycology - a multifaceted approach to fungi and food
Battilani, P. (2008) · World Mycotoxin Journal · doi:10.3920/wmj2008.x017 · Cited by 163
Handling and storage of food grains in tropical and subtropical areas
Hall, D. W. (1970) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 119
Frisvad, J. C., Andersen, B. I. 0.-0.-4.-9., & Samson, R. A. (2007) · CRC Press eBooks · doi:10.1201/9781420020984 · Cited by 107
Cited by
Mannaa, M., & Kim, K. D. (2017) · Mycobiology · doi:10.5941/myco.2017.45.4.240 · Cited by 316
Effect of climate change on Aspergillus flavus and aflatoxin B1 production
Medina, A., Rodriguez, A., & Magan, N. (2014) · Frontiers in Microbiology · doi:10.3389/fmicb.2014.00348 · Cited by 300
Self-citationThe efficiency of lactic acid bacteria against pathogenic fungi and mycotoxins
Perczak, A., Goliński, P., Bryła, M., & Waśkiewicz, A. (2018) · Archives of Industrial Hygiene and Toxicology · doi:10.2478/aiht-2018-69-3051 · Cited by 69
Abdel-Kareem, M. M., Zohri, A.-N. A., & Nasr, S. A. E. E. (2021) · Journal of Plant Diseases and Protection · doi:10.1007/s41348-021-00461-y · Cited by 25
Metadata
- Authors
- Magan, N., & Aldred, D.
- Venue
- International Journal of Food Microbiology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2007-10
- Volume
- 119
- Issue
- 1-2
- Pages
- 131-139
- ISSN
- 0168-1605 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2004281058
- Cited by
- 676
- References
- 19
- FWCI
- 20.79
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Post-harvest control strategies: Minimizing mycotoxins in the food chain. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2007.07.034
- The paper
- Magan, N., & Aldred, D. (2007). Post-harvest control strategies: Minimizing mycotoxins in the food chain. International Journal of Food Microbiology. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2007.07.034
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.