Cited by 153Food Safety and HygieneListeria monocytogenes in Food SafetySalmonella and Campylobacter epidemiology

A Microbial Assessment Scheme to measure microbial performance of Food Safety Management Systems

Open access
Jacxsens, L., Kussaga, J., Luning, P.A., Van der Spiegel, M., Devlieghere, F., Uyttendaele, M.·2009·International Journal of Food Microbiology

Abstract

A Food Safety Management System (FSMS) implemented in a food processing industry is based on Good Hygienic Practices (GHP), Hazard Analysis Critical Control Point (HACCP) principles and should address both food safety control and assurance activities in order to guarantee food safety. One of the most emerging challenges is to assess the performance of a present FSMS. The objective of this work is to explain the development of a Microbial Assessment Scheme (MAS) as a tool for a systematic analysis of microbial counts in order to assess the current microbial performance of an implemented FSMS. It is assumed that low numbers of microorganisms and small variations in microbial counts indicate an effective FSMS. The MAS is a procedure that defines the identification of critical sampling locations, the selection of microbiological parameters, the assessment of sampling frequency, the selection of sampling method and method of analysis, and finally data processing and interpretation. Based on the MAS assessment, microbial safety level profiles can be derived, indicating which microorganisms and to what extent they contribute to food safety for a specific food processing company. The MAS concept is illustrated with a case study in the pork processing industry, where ready-to-eat meat products are produced (cured, cooked ham and cured, dried bacon).

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2009.02.018

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Authors
Jacxsens, L., Kussaga, J., Luning, P. A., Van der Spiegel, M., Devlieghere, F., & Uyttendaele, M.
Affiliations
  • Ghent University (BE)
  • Wageningen University & Research (NL)
Corresponding author
Jacxsens, L.
Venue
International Journal of Food Microbiology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2009-08
Volume
134
Issue
1-2
Pages
113-125
ISSN
0168-1605 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2052276421
Cited by
153
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 9
FWCI
18.44
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • International Journal of Food Microbiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Socio-Environmental Systems Modeling (acceptedVersion)
  • Ghent University Academic Bibliography (Ghent University) (submittedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
Funders
University of Toronto
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Food Safety and Hygiene
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Biotechnology › Listeria monocytogenes in Food Safety
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Salmonella and Campylobacter epidemiology
Keywords
food safety management systems, microbiological sampling, sampling frequency, pork processing, ready-to-eat meat products, dry-cured ham, HACCP, good hygienic practices
MeSH terms
Animals, Consumer Product Safety, Decision Trees, Food Contamination, Food Handling, Food-Processing Industry, Humans, Hygiene, Meat Products, Quality Control, Risk Management, Swine, Colony Count, Microbial, Proportional Hazards Models, Risk Assessment

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review