Cited by 272Probiotics and Fermented FoodsMycotoxins in Agriculture and FoodEssential Oils and Antimicrobial Activity

Lactobacillus plantarum with broad antifungal activity: A promising approach to increase safety and shelf-life of cereal-based products

Open access
Russo, Pasquale, Arena, Mattia Pia, Fiocco, Daniela, Capozzi, Vittorio, Drider, Djamel, Spano, Giuseppe·2017·International Journal of Food Microbiology

Abstract

Cereal-based fermented products are worldwide diffused staple food resources and cereal-based beverages represent a promising innovative field in the food market. Contamination and development of spoilage filamentous fungi can result in loss of cereal-based food products and it is a critical safety concern due to their potential ability to produce mycotoxins. Lactic Acid Bacteria (LAB) have been proposed as green strategy for the control of the moulds in the food industry due to their ability to produce antifungal metabolites. In this work, eighty-eight Lactobacillus plantarum strains were screened for their antifungal activity against Aspergillus niger, Aspergillus flavus, Fusarium culmorum, Penicillium roqueforti, Penicillium expansum, Penicillium chrysogenum, and Cladosporium spp. The overlayed method was used for a preliminary discrimination of the strains as no, mild and strong inhibitors. L. plantarum isolates that displayed broad antifungal spectrum activity were further screened based on the antifungal properties of their cell-free supernatant (CFS). CFSs from L. plantarum UFG 108 and L. plantarum UFG 121, in reason of their antifungal potential, were characterized and analyzed by HPLC. Results indicated that lactic acid was produced at high concentration during the growth phase, suggesting that this metabolic aptitude, associated with the low pH, contributed to explain the highlighted antifungal phenotype. Production of phenyllactic acid was also observed. Finally, a new oat-based beverage was obtained by fermentation with the strongest antifungal strain L. plantarum UFG 121. This product was submitted or not to a thermal stabilization and artificially contaminated with F. culmorum. Samples containing L. plantarum UFG 121 showed the best biopreservative effects, since that no differences were observed in terms of some qualitative features between not or contaminated samples with F. culmorum. Here we demonstrate, for the first time, the suitability of LAB strains for the fermentation and antifungal biopreservation of oat-based products.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2016.04.027

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In addition to major economic losses associated with spoilage, some fungi pose a threat to food safety due to their ability to produce mycotoxins.

    “In addition to the major economic losses associated with spoilage, some fungi pose a threat to food safety due to their ability to produce mycotoxins [139,148,151,152,153,154,155].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 45 · Cited by 272

Authors
Russo, P., Arena, M. P., Fiocco, D., Capozzi, V., Drider, D., & Spano, G.
Affiliations
  • University of Foggia (IT)
  • Université de Lille (FR)
Corresponding author
Spano, Giuseppe
Venue
International Journal of Food Microbiology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2017-04
Volume
247
Pages
48-54
ISSN
0168-1605 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2346098852
Cited by
272
References
45
Citations by year
2026: 14 · 2025: 21 · 2024: 27 · 2023: 34 · 2022: 40 · 2021: 38 · 2020: 27 · 2019: 24 · 2018: 24 · 2017: 22 · 2016: 1
FWCI
29.80
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • International Journal of Food Microbiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Institutional Research Information System University of Ferrara (University of Ferrara) (submittedVersion, public-domain)
  • IRIS UNIMORE (University of Modena and Reggio Emilia) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
Ministero dell’Istruzione, dell’Università e della Ricerca (PON02_00186_2937475)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Probiotics and Fermented Foods
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Mycotoxins in Agriculture and Food
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Essential Oils and Antimicrobial Activity
Keywords
Lactobacillus plantarum, antifungal activity, lactic acid bacteria, biopreservation, Fusarium culmorum, filamentous fungi, mycotoxin contamination, cell-free supernatant, lactic acid, phenyllactic acid, Aspergillus niger, Aspergillus flavus, Penicillium, Cladosporium, shelf life, thermal stabilization
MeSH terms
Antibiosis, Aspergillus niger, Edible Grain, Fermentation, Food Preservation, Fusarium, Penicillium, Lactic Acid, Lactiplantibacillus plantarum, Food Safety, Food Storage

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review