The crucial role of yeasts in the wet fermentation of coffee beans and quality
Abstract
The objective of this study was to investigate the role of yeasts in the wet fermentation of coffee beans and their contribution to coffee quality using a novel approach. Natamycin (300 ppm) was added to the fermentation mass to suppress yeast growth and their metabolic activities, and the resultant microbial ecology, bean chemistry and sensory quality were analyzed and compared to non-treated spontaneous fermentation we reported previously. The yeast community was dominated by Hanseniaspora uvarum and Pichia kudriavzevii and grew to a maximum population of about 5.5 log CFU/g in the absence of Natamycin, while when Natamycin was added yeasts were suppressed. The major bacterial species in both the spontaneous and yeast-suppressed fermentations included the lactic acid bacteria Leuconostoc mesenteroides and Lactococcus lactis, the acetic acid bacteria Gluconobacter cerinus and Acetobacter persici and the Enterobacteriaceae Enterobacter, Citrobacter and Erwinia. For both fermentations, the mucilage layers were completely degraded by the end of the process and the absence of yeast activities had no significant impact on mucilage degradation. During fermentation, reducing sugars were consumed while lactic acid was accumulated inside the beans, and its concentration was significantly higher in the spontaneous fermentation (3 times) than that where yeasts were suppressed by Natamycin. Glycerol was detected with a concentration of 0.08% in the absence of Natamycin and was not identified when Natamycin was added. Green beans fermented with yeast growth contained a higher amount of isoamyl alcohol (21 times), ethanol (3.7 times), acetaldehyde (8 times), and ethyl acetate (25 times) compared to beans fermented in the absence of yeast activities, which remained higher in the former after roasting. Beans fermented without yeast activities had a mild fruity aroma, and lower sensory scores of fragrances (7.0), flavor (6.5), acidity (6.3), body (7.0) and overall score (6.5) compared to the former. These findings demonstrated the crucial roles of yeasts in wet fermentation of coffee beans and for producing high quality coffee.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In fermentation, other low-abundance primary metabolites including glycerol, succinate, acetate, and lactate significantly influence flavor characteristics, enhance the complexity of fermentation products, and are closely associated with yeast metabolic capacity.
“In the fermentation process, while alcohols play a crucial role in determining the overall flavor profile, other low-abundance primary metabolites also significantly influence flavor characteristics. These metabolites, including glycerol, succinate, acetate, and lactate, not only enhance the complexity of fermentation products but are also closely associated with yeast metabolic capacity [54,57,58”
From The Metabolic Pathways of Yeast and Acetic Acid Bacteria During Fruit Vinegar Fermentation and Their Influence on Flavor Development (2025) · cites this paper as [57]
Cites
Yeast and bacterial modulation of wine aroma and flavour
SWIEGERS, J. H., BARTOWSKY, E. J., HENSCHKE, P. A., & PRETORIUS, I. S. (2005) · Australian Journal of Grape and Wine Research · doi:10.1111/j.1755-0238.2005.tb00285.x · Cited by 1,216 · see citing works
Complexity of coffee flavor: A compositional and sensory perspective
Sunarharum, W. B., Williams, D. J., & Smyth, H. E. (2014) · Food Research International · doi:10.1016/j.foodres.2014.02.030 · Cited by 620 · see citing works
Potent odorants of raw Arabica coffee. Their changes during roasting
Czerny, M., & Grosch, W. (2000) · Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry · doi:10.1021/jf990609n · Cited by 232 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Ge, Y., Wu, Y., Aihaiti, A., Wang, L., Wang, Y., Xing, J., Zhu, M., & Hong, J. (2025) · Microorganisms · doi:10.3390/microorganisms13030477 · Cited by 49 · see citing works
- Authors
- Elhalis, H., Cox, J., Frank, D., & Zhao, J.
- Affiliations
- UNSW Sydney (AU)
- Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (AU)
- Corresponding author
- Zhao, Jian
- Venue
- International Journal of Food Microbiology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2020-11
- Volume
- 333
- Pages
- 108796
- ISSN
- 0168-1605 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3044235879
- Cited by
- 122
- References
- 3
- Citations by year
- 2026: 18 · 2025: 20 · 2024: 27 · 2023: 28 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 3
- FWCI
- 9.24
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- International Journal of Food Microbiology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Fermentation and Sensory Analysis
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Coffee research and impacts
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Biotechnology › Biochemical and biochemical processes
- Keywords
- yeast, Hanseniaspora uvarum, Candida krusei, natamycin, coffee bean quality, lactate accumulation, glycerol, volatile compounds, coffee aroma, sensory quality, lactic acid bacteria, acetic acid bacteria, Enterobacteriaceae
- MeSH terms
- Acetaldehyde, Acetates, Ethanol, Pentanols, Anti-Infective Agents, Bacteria, Coffee, Fermentation, Odorants, Pichia, Natamycin, Taste, Yeasts, Bioreactors, Acetic Acid, Lactic Acid, Hanseniaspora
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review